
{"id":773,"date":"2000-09-17T04:12:54","date_gmt":"2000-09-17T00:12:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/d\/dominican-republic\/dominican-republic-presidential-election-2000.html"},"modified":"2007-09-26T21:29:51","modified_gmt":"2007-09-26T17:29:51","slug":"dominican-republic-presidential-election-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/d\/dominican-republic\/dominican-republic-presidential-election-2000.html","title":{"rendered":"\u0414\u043e\u043c\u0438\u043d\u0438\u043a\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u0430\u044f \u0420\u0435\u0441\u043f\u0443\u0431\u043b\u0438\u043a\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u044b 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"<table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<col width=\"156\" \/>\n<col span=\"3\" width=\"64\" \/>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Regions<\/td>\n<td>Joaqu\u00edn Balaguer<\/td>\n<td>Danilo Medina<\/td>\n<td>Hip\u00f3lito    MEJ\u00cdA <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>\u0421\u0443\u043c\u043c\u0430<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\"><strong>24.6%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\"><strong>24.9%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td align=\"right\"><strong>49.9%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      1. \u00c1zua<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.9%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">23.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">53.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      2. Bahoruco<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.6%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.6%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">52.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      3. Barahona<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">29.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">20.9%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">48.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      4. Dajab\u00f3n<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">22.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">24.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">52.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>   5. Duarte <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.9%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">48.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      6. El\u00edas Pi\u00f1a<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">30.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">26.9%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">42.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>   7. El Seibo <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">19.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.9%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">51.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>   8. Espaillat <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.7%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">48.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>      9. Hato Mayor<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">27.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">43.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     10. Independencia<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">24.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">47.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     11. La Altagracia<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">35.7%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">24.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">39.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     12. La Romana<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">11.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">47.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">41.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     13. La Vega<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">26.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">48.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>  14. Mar\u00eda Trinidad S\u00e1nchez <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">27.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">16.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">55.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     15. Monse\u00f1or Nouel<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.0%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">49.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     16. Monte Cristi<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">19.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">52.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     17. Monte Plata<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">22.6%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">26.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">50.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     18. Pedernales<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">32.7%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">45.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>  19. Peravia <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">26.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">24.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">48.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     20. Puerto Plata<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">30.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">47.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     21. Salcedo<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">22.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">32.0%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">44.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     22. Saman\u00e1<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">32.2%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">20.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">46.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>  23. S\u00e1nchez Ram\u00edrez <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">23.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">50.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     24. San Crist\u00f3bal<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.8%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">49.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     26. San Juan<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">25.1%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">31.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">42.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     27. San Pedro de Macor\u00eds<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">19.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">29.3%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">50.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     28. Santiago<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.7%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">21.0%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">49.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>  29. Santiago Rodr\u00edguez <\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">19.6%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">28.7%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">51.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>     31. Valverde<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">29.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">15.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">54.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Distrito Nacional<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">20.4%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">26.5%<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">52.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Regions Joaqu\u00edn Balaguer Danilo Medina Hip\u00f3lito MEJ\u00cdA \u0421\u0443\u043c\u043c\u0430 24.6% 24.9% 49.9% 1. \u00c1zua 21.9% 23.8% 53.7% 2. Bahoruco 21.6% 25.6% 52.3% 3. Barahona 29.3% 20.9% 48.4% 4. Dajab\u00f3n 22.3% 24.8% 52.6% 5. Duarte 28.4% 21.9% 48.9% 6. El\u00edas Pi\u00f1a 30.3% 26.9% 42.6% 7. El Seibo 19.2% 28.9% 51.4% 8. Espaillat 25.5% 25.7% 48.1% 9. Hato [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[69],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/773"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}