
{"id":137,"date":"1913-08-30T21:48:33","date_gmt":"1913-08-30T17:48:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/a\/australia\/1913-referendum-australia.html"},"modified":"2007-08-30T22:02:00","modified_gmt":"2007-08-30T18:02:00","slug":"1913-referendum-australia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/a\/australia\/1913-referendum-australia.html","title":{"rendered":"\u0410\u0432\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043b\u0438\u044f. \u0420\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043c, 1913"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>31 \u041c\u0430\u0439 1913<\/p>\n<p>(6) Trade and Commerce; (7) Corporations; (8) Industrial Matters; (9) Trusts; (10) Nationalisation of Monopolies; (11) Railway Disputes<\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 1<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Trade and Commerce) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Trade and Commerce) 1912 sought to extend the Commonwealth Parliament&#8217;s power to make laws with respect to trade and commerce.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em>Obtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 24 196 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 2<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Corporations) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Corporations) 1912 sought to extend the Commonwealth Parliament&#8217;s power to make laws with respect to corporations.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em>Obtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 26 113 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 3<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Industrial Matters) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Industrial Matters) 1912 sought to extend the Commonwealth Parliament&#8217;s power to make laws with respect to industrial matters.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em>Obtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 26 010 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 4<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Trusts) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Trusts) 1912 sought to give the Commonwealth Parliament power to make laws with respect to trusts.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em>Obtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 8 612 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 5<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Nationalisation of Monopolies) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Nationalisation of Monopolies) 1912 sought to give the Commonwealth Parliament power to make laws with respect to monopolies.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em>Obtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 24 782 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<h3>\u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 6<\/h3>\n<blockquote><p>Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Railway Disputes) 1912&#8217;?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Constitution Alteration (Railways Disputes) 1912 sought to give the Commonwealth Parliament power over industrial relations in the State railway services.<\/p>\n[table &#8220;&#8221; not found \/]<br \/>\n\n<p><em><br \/>\nObtained majority in three States and an overall minority of 33 688 votes.<br \/>\n<strong>Not carried<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>31 \u041c\u0430\u0439 1913 (6) Trade and Commerce; (7) Corporations; (8) Industrial Matters; (9) Trusts; (10) Nationalisation of Monopolies; (11) Railway Disputes \u0412\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441 1 Do you approve of the proposed law for the alteration of the Constitution entitled &#8216;Constitution Alteration (Trade and Commerce) 1912&#8217;? Constitution Alteration (Trade and Commerce) 1912 sought to extend the Commonwealth Parliament&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[48],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=137"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/137\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}