{"id":1231,"date":"2010-06-23T02:05:47","date_gmt":"2010-06-22T23:05:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/p\/poland\/polsha-prezidentskie-vybory-2010.html"},"modified":"2010-07-09T20:19:43","modified_gmt":"2010-07-09T17:19:43","slug":"polsha-prezidentskie-vybory-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/p\/poland\/polsha-prezidentskie-vybory-2010.html","title":{"rendered":"\u041f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0448\u0430. \u041f\u0440\u0435\u0437\u0438\u0434\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u044b 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u041f\u0435\u0440\u0432\u044b\u0439 \u0442\u0443\u0440:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n Komorowski <\/td>\n\n  Kaczynski <\/td>\n\n Napieralski <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lower Silesian<\/td>\n\n 47.29<\/td>\n\n 30.88<\/td>\n\n 14.20<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Kuyavian-Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 45.82<\/td>\n\n 28.73<\/td>\n\n 17.30<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lublin<\/td>\n\n 27.65<\/td>\n\n 48.76<\/td>\n\n 12.78<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lubusz<\/td>\n\n 51.09<\/td>\n\n 25.24<\/td>\n\n 16.39<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lodz<\/td>\n\n 36.11<\/td>\n\n 39.75<\/td>\n\n 15.49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lesser Poland<\/td>\n\n 35.35<\/td>\n\n 45.78<\/td>\n\n 10.49<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Masovian<\/td>\n\n 39.73<\/td>\n\n 40.52<\/td>\n\n 11.44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Opole<\/td>\n\n 51.62<\/td>\n\n 26.67<\/td>\n\n 12.85<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Subcarpathian<\/td>\n\n 26.69<\/td>\n\n 54.09<\/td>\n\n 10.57<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Podlasie<\/td>\n\n 36.32<\/td>\n\n 43.54<\/td>\n\n 11.63<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 52.66<\/td>\n\n 28.41<\/td>\n\n 11.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Silesian<\/td>\n\n 45.14<\/td>\n\n 32.52<\/td>\n\n 14.72<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Swietokrzyskie<\/td>\n\n 29.54<\/td>\n\n 44.49<\/td>\n\n 16.70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Warmian-Masurian<\/td>\n\n 47.89<\/td>\n\n 28.30<\/td>\n\n 15.43<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Greater Poland<\/td>\n\n 47.00<\/td>\n\n 28.38<\/td>\n\n 16.14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n West Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 49.99<\/td>\n\n 24.97<\/td>\n\n 17.61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Total<\/td>\n\n 41.54<\/td>\n\n 36.46<\/td>\n\n 13.68<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

\u0412\u0442\u043e\u0440\u043e\u0439 \u0442\u0443\u0440 <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n  Kaczynski <\/td>\n\n Komorowski <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lower Silesian<\/td>\n\n 39.92<\/td>\n\n 60.08<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Kuyavian-Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 39.4<\/td>\n\n 60.6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lublin<\/td>\n\n 62.85<\/td>\n\n 37.15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lubusz<\/td>\n\n 33.3<\/td>\n\n 66.7<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lodz<\/td>\n\n 52.67<\/td>\n\n 47.33<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lesser Poland<\/td>\n\n 56.12<\/td>\n\n 43.88<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Masovian<\/td>\n\n 50.58<\/td>\n\n 49.42<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Opole<\/td>\n\n 35.38<\/td>\n\n 64.62<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Subcarpathian<\/td>\n\n 65.19<\/td>\n\n 34.81<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Podlasie<\/td>\n\n 52.21<\/td>\n\n 47.79<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 35.28<\/td>\n\n 64.72<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Silesian<\/td>\n\n 42.6<\/td>\n\n 57.4<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Swietokrzyskie<\/td>\n\n 59.56<\/td>\n\n 40.44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Warmian-Masurian<\/td>\n\n 37.7<\/td>\n\n 62.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Greater Poland<\/td>\n\n 39.45<\/td>\n\n 60.55<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n West Pomeranian<\/td>\n\n 33.74<\/td>\n\n 66.26<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Total<\/td>\n\n 46.99<\/td>\n\n 53.01<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n \t\t\n\t\t\t\t