{"id":1186,"date":"2009-10-04T16:30:08","date_gmt":"2009-10-04T13:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/shvejcariya-referendum-27-sentyabrya-2009-g.html"},"modified":"2009-10-31T02:41:41","modified_gmt":"2009-10-30T23:41:41","slug":"shvejcariya-referendum-27-sentyabrya-2009-g","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/shvejcariya-referendum-27-sentyabrya-2009-g.html","title":{"rendered":"\u0428\u0432\u0435\u0439\u0446\u0430\u0440\u0438\u044f. \u0420\u0435\u0444\u0435\u0440\u0435\u043d\u0434\u0443\u043c 27 \u0441\u0435\u043d\u0442\u044f\u0431\u0440\u044f 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"

a limited increase of VAT to continue financing the Invalidenversicherung (Disability Insurance)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n Kanton<\/td>\n\n % Ja<\/td>\n\n % Nein<\/td>\n\n % Stimmbet.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Z\u00fcrich<\/td>\n\n 54.8%<\/td>\n\n 45.2%<\/td>\n\n 40.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Bern<\/td>\n\n 54.2%<\/td>\n\n 45.8%<\/td>\n\n 39.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Luzern<\/td>\n\n 53.1%<\/td>\n\n 46.9%<\/td>\n\n 39.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Uri<\/td>\n\n 43.3%<\/td>\n\n 56.7%<\/td>\n\n 56.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schwyz<\/td>\n\n 42.3%<\/td>\n\n 57.7%<\/td>\n\n 38.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Obwalden<\/td>\n\n 43.0%<\/td>\n\n 57.0%<\/td>\n\n 39.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Nidwalden<\/td>\n\n 45.3%<\/td>\n\n 54.7%<\/td>\n\n 41.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Glarus<\/td>\n\n 44.9%<\/td>\n\n 55.1%<\/td>\n\n 39.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Zug<\/td>\n\n 49.2%<\/td>\n\n 50.8%<\/td>\n\n 49.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Freiburg<\/td>\n\n 59.1%<\/td>\n\n 40.9%<\/td>\n\n 41.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Solothurn<\/td>\n\n 46.2%<\/td>\n\n 53.8%<\/td>\n\n 41.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Basel-Stadt<\/td>\n\n 62.7%<\/td>\n\n 37.3%<\/td>\n\n 44.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Basel-Landschaft<\/td>\n\n 57.2%<\/td>\n\n 42.8%<\/td>\n\n 38.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schaffhausen<\/td>\n\n 44.6%<\/td>\n\n 55.4%<\/td>\n\n 63.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Appenzell A.-Rh.<\/td>\n\n 44.9%<\/td>\n\n 55.1%<\/td>\n\n 44.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Appenzell I.-Rh.<\/td>\n\n 35.7%<\/td>\n\n 64.3%<\/td>\n\n 35.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n St. Gallen<\/td>\n\n 46.1%<\/td>\n\n 53.9%<\/td>\n\n 42.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Graub\u00fcnden<\/td>\n\n 57.1%<\/td>\n\n 42.9%<\/td>\n\n 32.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Aargau<\/td>\n\n 48.6%<\/td>\n\n 51.4%<\/td>\n\n 37.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Thurgau<\/td>\n\n 40.7%<\/td>\n\n 59.3%<\/td>\n\n 40.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Tessin<\/td>\n\n 52.3%<\/td>\n\n 47.7%<\/td>\n\n 32.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Waadt<\/td>\n\n 63.6%<\/td>\n\n 36.4%<\/td>\n\n 44.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Wallis<\/td>\n\n 61.7%<\/td>\n\n 38.3%<\/td>\n\n 42.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Neuenburg<\/td>\n\n 64.1%<\/td>\n\n 35.9%<\/td>\n\n 42.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Genf<\/td>\n\n 65.9%<\/td>\n\n 34.1%<\/td>\n\n 50.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Jura<\/td>\n\n 64.7%<\/td>\n\n 35.3%<\/td>\n\n 33.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schweiz<\/td>\n\n 54.5%<\/td>\n\n 45.5%<\/td>\n\n 40.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

accepting the decision not to introduce allgemeine Volksinitiativen (public initiatives) (which has been deemed impossible for procedural reasons)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n Kanton<\/td>\n\n % Ja<\/td>\n\n % Nein<\/td>\n\n % Stimmbet.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Z\u00fcrich<\/td>\n\n 71.4%<\/td>\n\n 28.6%<\/td>\n\n 40.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Bern<\/td>\n\n 69.5%<\/td>\n\n 30.5%<\/td>\n\n 39.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Luzern<\/td>\n\n 66.4%<\/td>\n\n 33.6%<\/td>\n\n 39.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Uri<\/td>\n\n 53.5%<\/td>\n\n 46.5%<\/td>\n\n 56.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schwyz<\/td>\n\n 61.1%<\/td>\n\n 38.9%<\/td>\n\n 38.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Obwalden<\/td>\n\n 66.6%<\/td>\n\n 33.4%<\/td>\n\n 39.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Nidwalden<\/td>\n\n 68.0%<\/td>\n\n 32.0%<\/td>\n\n 41.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Glarus<\/td>\n\n 66.6%<\/td>\n\n 33.4%<\/td>\n\n 39.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Zug<\/td>\n\n 65.1%<\/td>\n\n 34.9%<\/td>\n\n 49.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Freiburg<\/td>\n\n 66.2%<\/td>\n\n 33.8%<\/td>\n\n 41.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Solothurn<\/td>\n\n 59.8%<\/td>\n\n 40.2%<\/td>\n\n 41.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Basel-Stadt<\/td>\n\n 68.8%<\/td>\n\n 31.2%<\/td>\n\n 44.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Basel-Landschaft<\/td>\n\n 72.0%<\/td>\n\n 28.0%<\/td>\n\n 38.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schaffhausen<\/td>\n\n 58.3%<\/td>\n\n 41.7%<\/td>\n\n 63.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Appenzell A.-Rh.<\/td>\n\n 65.3%<\/td>\n\n 34.7%<\/td>\n\n 44.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Appenzell I.-Rh.<\/td>\n\n 60.9%<\/td>\n\n 39.1%<\/td>\n\n 35.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n St. Gallen<\/td>\n\n 64.3%<\/td>\n\n 35.7%<\/td>\n\n 42.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Graub\u00fcnden<\/td>\n\n 68.9%<\/td>\n\n 31.1%<\/td>\n\n 32.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Aargau<\/td>\n\n 62.2%<\/td>\n\n 37.8%<\/td>\n\n 37.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Thurgau<\/td>\n\n 63.0%<\/td>\n\n 37.0%<\/td>\n\n 40.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Tessin<\/td>\n\n 64.4%<\/td>\n\n 35.6%<\/td>\n\n 32.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Waadt<\/td>\n\n 75.1%<\/td>\n\n 24.9%<\/td>\n\n 44.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Wallis<\/td>\n\n 63.4%<\/td>\n\n 36.6%<\/td>\n\n 42.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Neuenburg<\/td>\n\n 66.7%<\/td>\n\n 33.3%<\/td>\n\n 42.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Genf<\/td>\n\n 74.6%<\/td>\n\n 25.4%<\/td>\n\n 50.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Jura<\/td>\n\n 63.0%<\/td>\n\n 37.0%<\/td>\n\n 33.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Schweiz<\/td>\n\n 67.9%<\/td>\n\n 32.1%<\/td>\n\n 38.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n \t\t\n\t\t\t\t