{"id":1118,"date":"2009-05-09T10:10:11","date_gmt":"2009-05-09T07:10:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/e\/ecuador\/ekvador-prezidentskie-vybory-2009.html"},"modified":"2009-05-09T10:34:26","modified_gmt":"2009-05-09T07:34:26","slug":"panama-parlamentskie-vybory-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/p\/panama\/panama-parlamentskie-vybory-2009.html","title":{"rendered":"\u041f\u0430\u043d\u0430\u043c\u0430. \u041f\u0430\u0440\u043b\u0430\u043c\u0435\u043d\u0442\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0432\u044b\u0431\u043e\u0440\u044b 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n PRD<\/td>\n\n PAN<\/td>\n\n CD<\/td>\n\n UP<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 1 -1 Changuinola <\/td>\n\n 45.47%<\/td>\n\n 8.95%<\/td>\n\n 35.61%<\/td>\n\n 2.14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 2 -1 Penonom\u00e9 <\/td>\n\n 41.7%<\/td>\n\n 31.84%<\/td>\n\n 0.1%<\/td>\n\n 5.63%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 3 -1 Col\u00f3n <\/td>\n\n 46.49%<\/td>\n\n 20.3%<\/td>\n\n 19.9%<\/td>\n\n 4.45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 4 -1 David <\/td>\n\n 36.42%<\/td>\n\n 23.54%<\/td>\n\n 33.22%<\/td>\n\n 2.79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 4 -3 Bugaba <\/td>\n\n 27.49%<\/td>\n\n 46.47%<\/td>\n\n 12.15%<\/td>\n\n 5.54%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -1 Arraij\u00e1n <\/td>\n\n 41.51%<\/td>\n\n 18.43%<\/td>\n\n 24.56%<\/td>\n\n 8.33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -5 Chorrera <\/td>\n\n 28.44%<\/td>\n\n 13.48%<\/td>\n\n 50.32%<\/td>\n\n 2.52%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -6 San Miguelito <\/td>\n\n 35.04%<\/td>\n\n 17.14%<\/td>\n\n 32.03%<\/td>\n\n 2.76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -7 San Felipe <\/td>\n\n 34.89%<\/td>\n\n 22.33%<\/td>\n\n 31.45%<\/td>\n\n 1.36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -8 San Francisco <\/td>\n\n 39.93%<\/td>\n\n 21.04%<\/td>\n\n 31.82%<\/td>\n\n 0.55%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -9 Las Cumbres <\/td>\n\n 31.04%<\/td>\n\n 26.86%<\/td>\n\n 29.61%<\/td>\n\n 2.95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8 -10 Panam\u00e1 <\/td>\n\n 36.51%<\/td>\n\n 18.87%<\/td>\n\n 33.68%<\/td>\n\n 2.09%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 9 -1 Santiago <\/td>\n\n 45.53%<\/td>\n\n 26.9%<\/td>\n\n 9.7%<\/td>\n\n 12.46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n TOTAL<\/td>\n\n 34.71%<\/td>\n\n 24.17%<\/td>\n\n 23.24%<\/td>\n\n 6.34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PRD PAN CD UP 1 -1 Changuinola  45.47% 8.95% 35.61% 2.14% 2 -1 Penonom\u00e9  41.7% 31.84% 0.1% 5.63% 3 -1 Col\u00f3n  46.49% 20.3% 19.9% 4.45% 4 -1 David  36.42% 23.54% 33.22% 2.79% 4 -3 Bugaba  27.49% 46.47% 12.15% 5.54% 8 -1 Arraij\u00e1n  41.51% 18.43% 24.56% 8.33% 8 -5 Chorrera  28.44% 13.48% 50.32% 2.52% 8 -6 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[132],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1118"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1118\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}