{"id":1038,"date":"2008-05-31T09:21:25","date_gmt":"2008-05-31T06:21:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/u\/usa\/oregon\/ssha-prajmeriz-v-oregone-2008.html"},"modified":"2008-05-31T09:22:03","modified_gmt":"2008-05-31T06:22:03","slug":"ssha-prajmeriz-v-oregone-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/ru\/countries\/u\/usa\/ssha-prajmeriz-v-oregone-2008.html","title":{"rendered":"\u0421\u0428\u0410. \u041f\u0440\u0430\u0439\u043c\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0437 \u0432 \u041e\u0440\u0435\u0433\u043e\u043d\u0435 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n Clinton<\/td>\n\n Obama<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Total<\/td>\n\n 40.8%<\/td>\n\n 58.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Baker<\/td>\n\n 47.5%<\/td>\n\n 48.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Benton<\/td>\n\n 30.3%<\/td>\n\n 69.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Clackamas<\/td>\n\n 45.5%<\/td>\n\n 53.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Clatsop<\/td>\n\n 46.0%<\/td>\n\n 52.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Columbia<\/td>\n\n 51.9%<\/td>\n\n 46.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Coos<\/td>\n\n 52.5%<\/td>\n\n 45.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Crook<\/td>\n\n 51.6%<\/td>\n\n 46.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Curry<\/td>\n\n 46.4%<\/td>\n\n 51.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Deschutes<\/td>\n\n 39.0%<\/td>\n\n 59.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Douglas<\/td>\n\n 50.2%<\/td>\n\n 47.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Gilliam<\/td>\n\n 43.8%<\/td>\n\n 54.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Grant<\/td>\n\n 38.9%<\/td>\n\n 55.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Harney<\/td>\n\n 48.2%<\/td>\n\n 46.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Hood River<\/td>\n\n 39.3%<\/td>\n\n 59.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Jackson<\/td>\n\n 39.5%<\/td>\n\n 59.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Jefferson<\/td>\n\n 47.6%<\/td>\n\n 51.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Josephine<\/td>\n\n 48.2%<\/td>\n\n 49.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Klamath<\/td>\n\n 52.0%<\/td>\n\n 44.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lake<\/td>\n\n 50.5%<\/td>\n\n 45.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lane<\/td>\n\n 37.3%<\/td>\n\n 62.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Lincoln<\/td>\n\n 46.4%<\/td>\n\n 53.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Linn<\/td>\n\n 50.6%<\/td>\n\n 48.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Malheur<\/td>\n\n 52.6%<\/td>\n\n 44.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Marion<\/td>\n\n 45.5%<\/td>\n\n 53.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Morrow<\/td>\n\n 60.1%<\/td>\n\n 37.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Multnomah<\/td>\n\n 34.1%<\/td>\n\n 65.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Polk<\/td>\n\n 44.2%<\/td>\n\n 54.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Sherman<\/td>\n\n 55.3%<\/td>\n\n 40.8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Tillamook<\/td>\n\n 50.3%<\/td>\n\n 49.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Umatilla<\/td>\n\n 53.7%<\/td>\n\n 44.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Union<\/td>\n\n 43.2%<\/td>\n\n 54.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Wallowa<\/td>\n\n 39.6%<\/td>\n\n 56.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Wasco<\/td>\n\n 48.5%<\/td>\n\n 50.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Washington<\/td>\n\n 40.6%<\/td>\n\n 58.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Wheeler<\/td>\n\n 49.4%<\/td>\n\n 47.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Yamhill<\/td>\n\n 46.2%<\/td>\n\n 52.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n \t\t\n\t\t\t\t