{"id":7898,"date":"2022-09-06T16:00:03","date_gmt":"2022-09-06T13:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/?p=7898"},"modified":"2022-09-06T16:00:04","modified_gmt":"2022-09-06T13:00:04","slug":"chile-constitutional-referendum-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/c\/chile\/chile-constitutional-referendum-2022.html","title":{"rendered":"Chile. Constitutional Referendum 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For 38,14%<br \/>\nAgainst 61,86%<br \/>\n<!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-a2680025b9602049032adb7076180ac7-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/CHILI-2022.jpg\"\n               title=\"\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/CHILI-2022.jpg\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/thumbs\/thumbs_CHILI-2022.jpg\"\n               data-image-id=\"4965\"\n               data-title=\"CHILI-2022\"\n               data-description=\"\"\n               data-image-slug=\"chili-2022\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"a2680025b9602049032adb7076180ac7\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"CHILI-2022\"\n                    alt=\"CHILI-2022\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/thumbs\/thumbs_CHILI-2022.jpg\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-1\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_.png\"\n               title=\"\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_.png\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/thumbs\/thumbs_2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_.png\"\n               data-image-id=\"4966\"\n               data-title=\"2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_\"\n               data-description=\"\"\n               data-image-slug=\"2022_chilean_referendum_by_commune_percentage-svg_\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"a2680025b9602049032adb7076180ac7\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_\"\n                    alt=\"2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/chile2022r\/thumbs\/thumbs_2022_Chilean_Referendum_by_commune_percentage.svg_.png\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2022_Chilean_national_plebiscite\">https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2022_Chilean_national_plebiscite<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For 38,14% Against 61,86% https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/2022_Chilean_national_plebiscite<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[59],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7898"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7898"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7898\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7899,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7898\/revisions\/7899"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}