{"id":683,"date":"2003-09-14T04:56:08","date_gmt":"2003-09-14T00:56:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/j\/jamaica\/jamaica-local-election-2003.html"},"modified":"2007-09-14T04:56:51","modified_gmt":"2007-09-14T00:56:51","slug":"jamaica-local-election-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/j\/jamaica\/jamaica-local-election-2003.html","title":{"rendered":"Jamaica. Local Election 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Regions<\/th>\n\t\tJamaica Labour Party<\/th>\n\t\tPeoples National Party<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t52.26%<\/td>\n\t\t47.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Clarendon<\/td>\n\t\t54.38%<\/td>\n\t\t45.58%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Hanover<\/td>\n\t\t52.80%<\/td>\n\t\t47.12%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kingston<\/td>\n\t\t62.64%<\/td>\n\t\t37.21%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Manchester<\/td>\n\t\t52.60%<\/td>\n\t\t46.87%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Portland<\/td>\n\t\t50.49%<\/td>\n\t\t49.46%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Andrew<\/td>\n\t\t46.44%<\/td>\n\t\t53.36%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Ann<\/td>\n\t\t52.39%<\/td>\n\t\t45.64%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Catherine<\/td>\n\t\t51.53%<\/td>\n\t\t48.07%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Elizabeth<\/td>\n\t\t51.33%<\/td>\n\t\t48.67%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. James<\/td>\n\t\t53.00%<\/td>\n\t\t45.95%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Mary<\/td>\n\t\t50.64%<\/td>\n\t\t48.41%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
St. Thomas<\/td>\n\t\t52.25%<\/td>\n\t\t47.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Trelawny<\/td>\n\t\t55.42%<\/td>\n\t\t44.15%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Westmoreland<\/td>\n\t\t43.19%<\/td>\n\t\t56.44%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Regions Jamaica Labour Party Peoples National Party TOTAL 52.26% 47.20% Clarendon 54.38% 45.58% Hanover 52.80% 47.12% Kingston 62.64% 37.21% Manchester 52.60% 46.87% Portland 50.49% 49.46% St. Andrew 46.44% 53.36% St. Ann 52.39% 45.64% St. Catherine 51.53% 48.07% St. Elizabeth 51.33% 48.67% St. James 53.00% 45.95% St. Mary 50.64% 48.41% St. Thomas 52.25% 47.70% Trelawny 55.42% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[98],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/683\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}