{"id":682,"date":"2007-09-14T04:56:07","date_gmt":"2007-09-14T00:56:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/j\/jamaica\/jamaica-legislative-election-2007.html"},"modified":"2007-09-14T04:56:07","modified_gmt":"2007-09-14T00:56:07","slug":"jamaica-legislative-election-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/j\/jamaica\/jamaica-legislative-election-2007.html","title":{"rendered":"Jamaica. Legislative Election 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<table class=\"rowstyle-alt\" id=\"wptable\" >\n\t<thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">regions<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">Jamaica Labour Party<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">Peoples National Party<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Total<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">50,14%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">49,77%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Clarendon<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">54,45%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">45,54%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Hanover<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">48,14%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">51,84%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Kingston<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">52,10%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">47,83%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Manchester<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">49,06%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">50,94%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Portland<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">50,23%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">49,77%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Andrew<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">46,43%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">53,42%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Ann<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">41,47%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">58,54%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Catherine<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">52,83%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">47,02%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Elizabeth<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">51,30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">48,47%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. James<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">53,60%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">46,26%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Mary<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">48,69%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">51,31%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">St. Thomas<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">51,85%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">48,02%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Trelawny<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">50,35%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">49,43%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"left\">Westmoreland<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">43,72%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">56,28%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table><p>\n<\/p><!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-5e4bfe48887ba12f5334b6a0a0f62efb-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n               title=\"\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/thumbs\/thumbs_2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n               data-image-id=\"796\"\n               data-title=\"2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n               data-description=\"\"\n               data-image-slug=\"2007-jamaica-legislative-gif\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"5e4bfe48887ba12f5334b6a0a0f62efb\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n                    alt=\"2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/thumbs\/thumbs_2007-jamaica-legislative.gif\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-1\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n               title=\"\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/thumbs\/thumbs_2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n               data-image-id=\"797\"\n               data-title=\"2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n               data-description=\"\"\n               data-image-slug=\"2007-jamaica-legislative2-gif\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"5e4bfe48887ba12f5334b6a0a0f62efb\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n                    alt=\"2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/jamaica2007\/thumbs\/thumbs_2007-jamaica-legislative2.gif\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>regions Jamaica Labour Party Peoples National Party Total 50,14% 49,77% Clarendon 54,45% 45,54% Hanover 48,14% 51,84% Kingston 52,10% 47,83% Manchester 49,06% 50,94% Portland 50,23% 49,77% St. Andrew 46,43% 53,42% St. Ann 41,47% 58,54% St. Catherine 52,83% 47,02% St. Elizabeth 51,30% 48,47% St. James 53,60% 46,26% St. Mary 48,69% 51,31% St. Thomas 51,85% 48,02% Trelawny 50,35% [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[98],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=682"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/682\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}