{"id":591,"date":"2005-09-13T02:40:29","date_gmt":"2005-09-12T22:40:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/t\/tanzania\/tanzania-legislative-election-2005.html"},"modified":"2007-09-13T02:41:12","modified_gmt":"2007-09-12T22:41:12","slug":"tanzania-legislative-election-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/t\/tanzania\/tanzania-legislative-election-2005.html","title":{"rendered":"Tanzania. Legislative Election 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Provinces<\/th>\n\t\tCCM<\/th>\n\t\tChadema<\/th>\n\t\tCUF<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t70.0%<\/td>\n\t\t8.2%<\/td>\n\t\t14.3%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Dodoma<\/td>\n\t\t83.1%<\/td>\n\t\t3.3%<\/td>\n\t\t10.4%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kigoma<\/td>\n\t\t57.6%<\/td>\n\t\t21.0%<\/td>\n\t\t2.7%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Singida<\/td>\n\t\t86.1%<\/td>\n\t\t5.4%<\/td>\n\t\t7.3%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tabora<\/td>\n\t\t71.3%<\/td>\n\t\t1.3%<\/td>\n\t\t23.3%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Dar Es Salaam<\/td>\n\t\t61.2%<\/td>\n\t\t9.4%<\/td>\n\t\t23.9%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kaskazinini Pemba<\/td>\n\t\t12.1%<\/td>\n\t\t1.3%<\/td>\n\t\t84.7%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kaskazinini Unguja<\/td>\n\t\t72.9%<\/td>\n\t\t0.4%<\/td>\n\t\t24.2%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kusini Pemba<\/td>\n\t\t20.7%<\/td>\n\t\t0.4%<\/td>\n\t\t77.9%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kusini Unguja<\/td>\n\t\t86.3%<\/td>\n\t\t0.1%<\/td>\n\t\t11.5%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Mjini Magharibi<\/td>\n\t\t67.4%<\/td>\n\t\t0.4%<\/td>\n\t\t30.5%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Morogoro<\/td>\n\t\t76.8%<\/td>\n\t\t3.6%<\/td>\n\t\t14.6%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Pwani<\/td>\n\t\t66.4%<\/td>\n\t\t5.0%<\/td>\n\t\t26.2%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kagera<\/td>\n\t\t64.3%<\/td>\n\t\t9.4%<\/td>\n\t\t10.5%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Mara<\/td>\n\t\t54.2%<\/td>\n\t\t23.2%<\/td>\n\t\t13.8%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Mwanza<\/td>\n\t\t68.2%<\/td>\n\t\t6.5%<\/td>\n\t\t20.2%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Shinyanga<\/td>\n\t\t63.5%<\/td>\n\t\t6.4%<\/td>\n\t\t15.5%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Arusha<\/td>\n\t\t64.2%<\/td>\n\t\t22.3%<\/td>\n\t\t1.3%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Kilimanjaro<\/td>\n\t\t65.1%<\/td>\n\t\t20.9%<\/td>\n\t\t1.9%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Manyara<\/td>\n\t\t71.3%<\/td>\n\t\t18.1%<\/td>\n\t\t1.0%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tanga<\/td>\n\t\t79.8%<\/td>\n\t\t0.8%<\/td>\n\t\t17.9%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lindi<\/td>\n\t\t70.7%<\/td>\n\t\t2.2%<\/td>\n\t\t25.8%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Mtwara<\/td>\n\t\t75.7%<\/td>\n\t\t2.8%<\/td>\n\t\t16.2%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Iringa<\/td>\n\t\t84.8%<\/td>\n\t\t6.6%<\/td>\n\t\t3.4%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Mbeya<\/td>\n\t\t79.9%<\/td>\n\t\t3.2%<\/td>\n\t\t4.4%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Rukwa<\/td>\n\t\t68.2%<\/td>\n\t\t14.4%<\/td>\n\t\t3.3%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Ruvuma<\/td>\n\t\t75.7%<\/td>\n\t\t6.7%<\/td>\n\t\t15.8%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zanzibar<\/td>\n\t\t54.6%<\/td>\n\t\t0.5%<\/td>\n\t\t43.1%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Provinces CCM Chadema CUF TOTAL 70.0% 8.2% 14.3% Dodoma 83.1% 3.3% 10.4% Kigoma 57.6% 21.0% 2.7% Singida 86.1% 5.4% 7.3% Tabora 71.3% 1.3% 23.3% Dar Es Salaam 61.2% 9.4% 23.9% Kaskazinini Pemba 12.1% 1.3% 84.7% Kaskazinini Unguja 72.9% 0.4% 24.2% Kusini Pemba 20.7% 0.4% 77.9% Kusini Unguja 86.3% 0.1% 11.5% Mjini Magharibi 67.4% 0.4% 30.5% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[159],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}