{"id":586,"date":"1999-09-11T10:07:21","date_gmt":"1999-09-11T06:07:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-29-1998.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T10:12:32","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T06:12:32","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-november-29-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-29-1998.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of November 29 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"

Financing of public transportation projects<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\tParticip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t41.18%<\/td>\n\t\t65.50%<\/td>\n\t\t34.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.56%<\/td>\n\t\t65.70%<\/td>\n\t\t34.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t40.69%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t38.61%<\/td>\n\t\t69.10%<\/td>\n\t\t30.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.39%<\/td>\n\t\t50.20%<\/td>\n\t\t49.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t49.55%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.47%<\/td>\n\t\t55.40%<\/td>\n\t\t44.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t54.00%<\/td>\n\t\t46.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t39.26%<\/td>\n\t\t66.80%<\/td>\n\t\t33.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t35.54%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t39.57%<\/td>\n\t\t59.60%<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t44.78%<\/td>\n\t\t75.10%<\/td>\n\t\t24.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t36.28%<\/td>\n\t\t68.60%<\/td>\n\t\t31.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t\t57.20%<\/td>\n\t\t42.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t43.36%<\/td>\n\t\t50.00%<\/td>\n\t\t50.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t34.41%<\/td>\n\t\t38.40%<\/td>\n\t\t61.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t37%<\/td>\n\t\t56.60%<\/td>\n\t\t43.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t33.70%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t39.64%<\/td>\n\t\t53.80%<\/td>\n\t\t46.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.04%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t34.53%<\/td>\n\t\t73.60%<\/td>\n\t\t26.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.49%<\/td>\n\t\t63.60%<\/td>\n\t\t36.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.46%<\/td>\n\t\t73.50%<\/td>\n\t\t26.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t30.26%<\/td>\n\t\t58.50%<\/td>\n\t\t41.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t41.01%<\/td>\n\t\t78.30%<\/td>\n\t\t21.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t40.80%<\/td>\n\t\t61.00%<\/td>\n\t\t39.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t38.31%<\/td>\n\t\t63.50%<\/td>\n\t\t36.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Popular Initiative “For a reasonoble drug policy”<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\tParticip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t41.38%<\/td>\n\t\t32.20%<\/td>\n\t\t67.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.56%<\/td>\n\t\t27.20%<\/td>\n\t\t72.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t40.71%<\/td>\n\t\t23.90%<\/td>\n\t\t76.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t38.61%<\/td>\n\t\t27.50%<\/td>\n\t\t72.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.40%<\/td>\n\t\t26.40%<\/td>\n\t\t73.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t49.52%<\/td>\n\t\t24.90%<\/td>\n\t\t75.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.62%<\/td>\n\t\t25.00%<\/td>\n\t\t75.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t31.75%<\/td>\n\t\t25.10%<\/td>\n\t\t74.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t39.23%<\/td>\n\t\t27.60%<\/td>\n\t\t72.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t35.58%<\/td>\n\t\t18.30%<\/td>\n\t\t81.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t39.60%<\/td>\n\t\t28.30%<\/td>\n\t\t71.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t45.01%<\/td>\n\t\t33.90%<\/td>\n\t\t66.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t36.32%<\/td>\n\t\t30.30%<\/td>\n\t\t69.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t62.75%<\/td>\n\t\t33.40%<\/td>\n\t\t66.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t43.28%<\/td>\n\t\t24.80%<\/td>\n\t\t75.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t34.42%<\/td>\n\t\t18.20%<\/td>\n\t\t81.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t37.06%<\/td>\n\t\t26.20%<\/td>\n\t\t73.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t33.71%<\/td>\n\t\t28.70%<\/td>\n\t\t71.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t39.72%<\/td>\n\t\t26.00%<\/td>\n\t\t74.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.05%<\/td>\n\t\t24.30%<\/td>\n\t\t75.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t34.53%<\/td>\n\t\t18.80%<\/td>\n\t\t81.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.48%<\/td>\n\t\t16.50%<\/td>\n\t\t83.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.44%<\/td>\n\t\t17.00%<\/td>\n\t\t83.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t30.32%<\/td>\n\t\t14.90%<\/td>\n\t\t85.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t41.10%<\/td>\n\t\t25.20%<\/td>\n\t\t74.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t40.84%<\/td>\n\t\t17.30%<\/td>\n\t\t82.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t38.37%<\/td>\n\t\t26.00%<\/td>\n\t\t74.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Federal law on work<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\tParticip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t41.18%<\/td>\n\t\t65.50%<\/td>\n\t\t34.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.56%<\/td>\n\t\t65.70%<\/td>\n\t\t34.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t40.69%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t38.61%<\/td>\n\t\t69.10%<\/td>\n\t\t30.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.39%<\/td>\n\t\t50.20%<\/td>\n\t\t49.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t49.55%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.47%<\/td>\n\t\t55.40%<\/td>\n\t\t44.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t54.00%<\/td>\n\t\t46.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t39.26%<\/td>\n\t\t66.80%<\/td>\n\t\t33.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t35.54%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t39.57%<\/td>\n\t\t59.60%<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t44.78%<\/td>\n\t\t75.10%<\/td>\n\t\t24.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t36.28%<\/td>\n\t\t68.60%<\/td>\n\t\t31.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t\t57.20%<\/td>\n\t\t42.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t43.36%<\/td>\n\t\t50.00%<\/td>\n\t\t50.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t34.41%<\/td>\n\t\t38.40%<\/td>\n\t\t61.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t37%<\/td>\n\t\t56.60%<\/td>\n\t\t43.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t33.70%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t39.64%<\/td>\n\t\t53.80%<\/td>\n\t\t46.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.04%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t34.53%<\/td>\n\t\t73.60%<\/td>\n\t\t26.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.49%<\/td>\n\t\t63.60%<\/td>\n\t\t36.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.46%<\/td>\n\t\t73.50%<\/td>\n\t\t26.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t30.26%<\/td>\n\t\t58.50%<\/td>\n\t\t41.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t41.01%<\/td>\n\t\t78.30%<\/td>\n\t\t21.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t40.80%<\/td>\n\t\t61.00%<\/td>\n\t\t39.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t38.31%<\/td>\n\t\t63.50%<\/td>\n\t\t36.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Financing of public transportation projects Canton Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 41.18% 65.50% 34.50% Berne 37.56% 65.70% 34.30% Lucerne 40.69% 63.10% 36.90% Uri 38.61% 69.10% 30.90% Schwyz 34.39% 50.20% 49.80% Obwald 49.55% 48.90% 51.10% Nidwald 43.47% 55.40% 44.60% Glaris 31.70% 54.00% 46.00% Zoug 39.26% 66.80% 33.20% Fribourg 35.54% 57.00% 43.00% Soleure 39.57% 59.60% 40.40% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/586"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/586\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}