{"id":585,"date":"1999-09-11T10:02:39","date_gmt":"1999-09-11T06:02:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-february-7-1999.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T10:07:20","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T06:07:20","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-february-7-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-february-7-1999.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of February 7 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"

Suppression of the “cantonal clause” (one canton – one minister) on Federal Council elections<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t42.74%<\/td>\n\t\t81.90%<\/td>\n\t\t18.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.73%<\/td>\n\t\t79.70%<\/td>\n\t\t20.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t45.58%<\/td>\n\t\t76.20%<\/td>\n\t\t23.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t30.53%<\/td>\n\t\t59.30%<\/td>\n\t\t40.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.59%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t37.32%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t42.58%<\/td>\n\t\t70.00%<\/td>\n\t\t30.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t33.54%<\/td>\n\t\t66.30%<\/td>\n\t\t33.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t41.43%<\/td>\n\t\t77.80%<\/td>\n\t\t22.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t31.88%<\/td>\n\t\t57.30%<\/td>\n\t\t42.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t42.07%<\/td>\n\t\t74.90%<\/td>\n\t\t25.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t46.32%<\/td>\n\t\t80.90%<\/td>\n\t\t19.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t41.48%<\/td>\n\t\t79.10%<\/td>\n\t\t20.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t59.59%<\/td>\n\t\t74.60%<\/td>\n\t\t25.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t44.11%<\/td>\n\t\t67.70%<\/td>\n\t\t32.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t37.61%<\/td>\n\t\t58.50%<\/td>\n\t\t41.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t39.91%<\/td>\n\t\t75.10%<\/td>\n\t\t24.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t31.65%<\/td>\n\t\t63.80%<\/td>\n\t\t36.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t37.65%<\/td>\n\t\t75.80%<\/td>\n\t\t24.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t45.42%<\/td>\n\t\t73.00%<\/td>\n\t\t27.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t36.22%<\/td>\n\t\t56.50%<\/td>\n\t\t43.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t29.26%<\/td>\n\t\t72.90%<\/td>\n\t\t27.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t22.04%<\/td>\n\t\t44.60%<\/td>\n\t\t55.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t26.29%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t39.59%<\/td>\n\t\t82.10%<\/td>\n\t\t17.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t20.49%<\/td>\n\t\t45.80%<\/td>\n\t\t54.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t38.01%<\/td>\n\t\t74.70%<\/td>\n\t\t25.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

“Hosing property for all”<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t43.03%<\/td>\n\t\t38.80%<\/td>\n\t\t61.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.73%<\/td>\n\t\t36.30%<\/td>\n\t\t63.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t45.70%<\/td>\n\t\t40.60%<\/td>\n\t\t59.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t30.81%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.60%<\/td>\n\t\t50.60%<\/td>\n\t\t49.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t37.39%<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t59.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t42.70%<\/td>\n\t\t43.70%<\/td>\n\t\t56.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t33.56%<\/td>\n\t\t51.50%<\/td>\n\t\t48.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t41.67%<\/td>\n\t\t39.40%<\/td>\n\t\t60.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t31.88%<\/td>\n\t\t38.80%<\/td>\n\t\t61.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t42.15%<\/td>\n\t\t45.50%<\/td>\n\t\t54.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t46.52%<\/td>\n\t\t20.60%<\/td>\n\t\t79.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t41.82%<\/td>\n\t\t44.80%<\/td>\n\t\t55.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t60.15%<\/td>\n\t\t40.60%<\/td>\n\t\t59.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t44.74%<\/td>\n\t\t41.30%<\/td>\n\t\t58.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t37.91%<\/td>\n\t\t42.10%<\/td>\n\t\t57.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t40.25%<\/td>\n\t\t45.10%<\/td>\n\t\t54.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t32.26%<\/td>\n\t\t38.70%<\/td>\n\t\t61.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t37.89%<\/td>\n\t\t57.80%<\/td>\n\t\t42.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t45.56%<\/td>\n\t\t49.90%<\/td>\n\t\t50.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t36.22%<\/td>\n\t\t44.90%<\/td>\n\t\t55.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t29.26%<\/td>\n\t\t40.00%<\/td>\n\t\t60.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t22.04%<\/td>\n\t\t41.90%<\/td>\n\t\t58.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t26.28%<\/td>\n\t\t35.00%<\/td>\n\t\t65.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t39.75%<\/td>\n\t\t38.40%<\/td>\n\t\t61.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t20.48%<\/td>\n\t\t34.50%<\/td>\n\t\t65.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t38.18%<\/td>\n\t\t41.30%<\/td>\n\t\t58.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Modification of the federal law on regional planning<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t42.49%<\/td>\n\t\t53.70%<\/td>\n\t\t46.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t37.73%<\/td>\n\t\t55.60%<\/td>\n\t\t44.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t45.51%<\/td>\n\t\t60.60%<\/td>\n\t\t39.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t30.47%<\/td>\n\t\t50.10%<\/td>\n\t\t49.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t34.58%<\/td>\n\t\t57.10%<\/td>\n\t\t42.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t37.28%<\/td>\n\t\t54.80%<\/td>\n\t\t45.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t42.51%<\/td>\n\t\t53.80%<\/td>\n\t\t46.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t33.57%<\/td>\n\t\t48.30%<\/td>\n\t\t51.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t41.49%<\/td>\n\t\t60.10%<\/td>\n\t\t39.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t31.87%<\/td>\n\t\t65.50%<\/td>\n\t\t34.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t42.07%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t46.19%<\/td>\n\t\t50.10%<\/td>\n\t\t49.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t41.47%<\/td>\n\t\t49.20%<\/td>\n\t\t50.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t59.59%<\/td>\n\t\t46.70%<\/td>\n\t\t53.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t44.33%<\/td>\n\t\t43.90%<\/td>\n\t\t56.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t37.88%<\/td>\n\t\t39.70%<\/td>\n\t\t60.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t39.85%<\/td>\n\t\t54.30%<\/td>\n\t\t45.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t31.87%<\/td>\n\t\t50.70%<\/td>\n\t\t49.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t37.59%<\/td>\n\t\t55.10%<\/td>\n\t\t44.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t45.41%<\/td>\n\t\t50.70%<\/td>\n\t\t49.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t36.22%<\/td>\n\t\t65.20%<\/td>\n\t\t34.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t29.26%<\/td>\n\t\t66.00%<\/td>\n\t\t34.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t22.04%<\/td>\n\t\t66.40%<\/td>\n\t\t33.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t26.30%<\/td>\n\t\t57.40%<\/td>\n\t\t42.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t39.51%<\/td>\n\t\t58.40%<\/td>\n\t\t41.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t20.48%<\/td>\n\t\t58.30%<\/td>\n\t\t41.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t37.96%<\/td>\n\t\t55.90%<\/td>\n\t\t44.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Suppression of the “cantonal clause” (one canton – one minister) on Federal Council elections Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 42.74% 81.90% 18.10% Berne 37.73% 79.70% 20.30% Lucerne 45.58% 76.20% 23.80% Uri 30.53% 59.30% 40.70% Schwyz 34.59% 63.10% 36.90% Obwald 37.32% 66.50% 33.50% Nidwald 42.58% 70.00% 30.00% Glaris 33.54% 66.30% 33.70% Zoug 41.43% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/585"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=585"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/585\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=585"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=585"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=585"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}