{"id":582,"date":"2000-09-11T08:34:47","date_gmt":"2000-09-11T04:34:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-march-12-2000.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T08:38:04","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T04:38:04","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-march-12-2000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-march-12-2000.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of March 12 2000"},"content":{"rendered":"

Introduction of female quotas in elections<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t44.37%<\/td>\n\t\t19.60%<\/td>\n\t\t80.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t43.44%<\/td>\n\t\t16.40%<\/td>\n\t\t83.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t46.92%<\/td>\n\t\t15.70%<\/td>\n\t\t84.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t51.70%<\/td>\n\t\t13.00%<\/td>\n\t\t87.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t50.27%<\/td>\n\t\t11.30%<\/td>\n\t\t88.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.91%<\/td>\n\t\t11.90%<\/td>\n\t\t88.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t44.36%<\/td>\n\t\t10.70%<\/td>\n\t\t89.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t39.74%<\/td>\n\t\t13.50%<\/td>\n\t\t86.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t46.80%<\/td>\n\t\t14.70%<\/td>\n\t\t85.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.52%<\/td>\n\t\t18.00%<\/td>\n\t\t82.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t45.53%<\/td>\n\t\t14.50%<\/td>\n\t\t85.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t51.20%<\/td>\n\t\t26.30%<\/td>\n\t\t73.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t42.42%<\/td>\n\t\t16.70%<\/td>\n\t\t83.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t66.63%<\/td>\n\t\t20.80%<\/td>\n\t\t79.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t50.20%<\/td>\n\t\t12.80%<\/td>\n\t\t87.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.16%<\/td>\n\t\t7.10%<\/td>\n\t\t92.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t43.27%<\/td>\n\t\t13.80%<\/td>\n\t\t86.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t35.76%<\/td>\n\t\t15.50%<\/td>\n\t\t84.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.42%<\/td>\n\t\t13.40%<\/td>\n\t\t86.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t41.65%<\/td>\n\t\t13.60%<\/td>\n\t\t86.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.08%<\/td>\n\t\t18.50%<\/td>\n\t\t81.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.79%<\/td>\n\t\t23.70%<\/td>\n\t\t76.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t33.88%<\/td>\n\t\t15.40%<\/td>\n\t\t84.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t35.36%<\/td>\n\t\t25.10%<\/td>\n\t\t74.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t46.27%<\/td>\n\t\t31.30%<\/td>\n\t\t68.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t38.56%<\/td>\n\t\t23.10%<\/td>\n\t\t76.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t42.18%<\/td>\n\t\t18.00%<\/td>\n\t\t82.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

The “Reduction of traffic” initiative\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t44.74%<\/td>\n\t\t26.70%<\/td>\n\t\t73.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t43.44%<\/td>\n\t\t23.30%<\/td>\n\t\t76.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t47.09%<\/td>\n\t\t20.20%<\/td>\n\t\t79.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t52.30%<\/td>\n\t\t20.50%<\/td>\n\t\t79.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t50.57%<\/td>\n\t\t14.20%<\/td>\n\t\t85.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t44.03%<\/td>\n\t\t15.20%<\/td>\n\t\t84.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t44.48%<\/td>\n\t\t16.00%<\/td>\n\t\t84.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t39.84%<\/td>\n\t\t21.20%<\/td>\n\t\t78.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t47.24%<\/td>\n\t\t20.20%<\/td>\n\t\t79.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.68%<\/td>\n\t\t14.40%<\/td>\n\t\t85.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t45.62%<\/td>\n\t\t19.40%<\/td>\n\t\t80.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t51.51%<\/td>\n\t\t33.90%<\/td>\n\t\t66.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t42.62%<\/td>\n\t\t22.20%<\/td>\n\t\t77.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t66.78%<\/td>\n\t\t21.60%<\/td>\n\t\t78.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t50.58%<\/td>\n\t\t22.00%<\/td>\n\t\t78.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.24%<\/td>\n\t\t14.30%<\/td>\n\t\t85.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t43.68%<\/td>\n\t\t20.50%<\/td>\n\t\t79.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t36.15%<\/td>\n\t\t21.30%<\/td>\n\t\t78.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.75%<\/td>\n\t\t18.30%<\/td>\n\t\t81.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t41.78%<\/td>\n\t\t18.30%<\/td>\n\t\t81.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.08%<\/td>\n\t\t23.40%<\/td>\n\t\t76.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.80%<\/td>\n\t\t16.60%<\/td>\n\t\t83.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t33.88%<\/td>\n\t\t10.00%<\/td>\n\t\t90.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t35.37%<\/td>\n\t\t17.70%<\/td>\n\t\t82.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t46.50%<\/td>\n\t\t22.20%<\/td>\n\t\t77.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t38.63%<\/td>\n\t\t13.90%<\/td>\n\t\t86.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t42.37%<\/td>\n\t\t21.30%<\/td>\n\t\t78.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Initiative “Denner” for faster and direct democracy\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t44.28%<\/td>\n\t\t32.50%<\/td>\n\t\t67.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t43.44%<\/td>\n\t\t26.40%<\/td>\n\t\t73.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t46.82%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t51.23%<\/td>\n\t\t26.60%<\/td>\n\t\t73.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t50.14%<\/td>\n\t\t33.70%<\/td>\n\t\t66.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.88%<\/td>\n\t\t26.20%<\/td>\n\t\t73.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t44.26%<\/td>\n\t\t27.00%<\/td>\n\t\t73.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t39.72%<\/td>\n\t\t28.10%<\/td>\n\t\t71.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t46.66%<\/td>\n\t\t29.20%<\/td>\n\t\t70.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.47%<\/td>\n\t\t26.60%<\/td>\n\t\t73.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t45.49%<\/td>\n\t\t29.40%<\/td>\n\t\t70.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t51%<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t68.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t42.28%<\/td>\n\t\t29.70%<\/td>\n\t\t70.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t66.55%<\/td>\n\t\t33.60%<\/td>\n\t\t66.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t49.94%<\/td>\n\t\t30.30%<\/td>\n\t\t69.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.07%<\/td>\n\t\t23.90%<\/td>\n\t\t76.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t43.10%<\/td>\n\t\t32.70%<\/td>\n\t\t67.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t35.58%<\/td>\n\t\t28.50%<\/td>\n\t\t71.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.31%<\/td>\n\t\t32.80%<\/td>\n\t\t67.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t41.39%<\/td>\n\t\t32.10%<\/td>\n\t\t67.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.08%<\/td>\n\t\t38.90%<\/td>\n\t\t61.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.79%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t33.88%<\/td>\n\t\t23.40%<\/td>\n\t\t76.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t35.37%<\/td>\n\t\t32.50%<\/td>\n\t\t67.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t46.16%<\/td>\n\t\t24.90%<\/td>\n\t\t75.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t38.42%<\/td>\n\t\t25.10%<\/td>\n\t\t74.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t42.10%<\/td>\n\t\t30.00%<\/td>\n\t\t70.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

The “Procreation respecting human dignity” initiative<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t44.38%<\/td>\n\t\t30.40%<\/td>\n\t\t69.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t43.44%<\/td>\n\t\t28.90%<\/td>\n\t\t71.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t47.01%<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t68.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t51.69%<\/td>\n\t\t34.40%<\/td>\n\t\t65.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t50.29%<\/td>\n\t\t30.90%<\/td>\n\t\t69.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t43.92%<\/td>\n\t\t27.70%<\/td>\n\t\t72.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t44.36%<\/td>\n\t\t24.40%<\/td>\n\t\t75.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t39.80%<\/td>\n\t\t25.90%<\/td>\n\t\t74.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t46.86%<\/td>\n\t\t29.80%<\/td>\n\t\t70.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.60%<\/td>\n\t\t21.50%<\/td>\n\t\t78.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t45.53%<\/td>\n\t\t29.60%<\/td>\n\t\t70.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t51.20%<\/td>\n\t\t36.10%<\/td>\n\t\t63.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t42.42%<\/td>\n\t\t28.10%<\/td>\n\t\t71.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t66.63%<\/td>\n\t\t34.50%<\/td>\n\t\t65.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t49.98%<\/td>\n\t\t33.30%<\/td>\n\t\t66.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.11%<\/td>\n\t\t29.40%<\/td>\n\t\t70.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t43.28%<\/td>\n\t\t34.30%<\/td>\n\t\t65.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t35.69%<\/td>\n\t\t33.90%<\/td>\n\t\t66.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.42%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t41.66%<\/td>\n\t\t32.40%<\/td>\n\t\t67.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.08%<\/td>\n\t\t38.10%<\/td>\n\t\t61.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t34.79%<\/td>\n\t\t15.20%<\/td>\n\t\t84.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t33.88%<\/td>\n\t\t20.80%<\/td>\n\t\t79.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t35.35%<\/td>\n\t\t19.90%<\/td>\n\t\t80.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t46.44%<\/td>\n\t\t15.20%<\/td>\n\t\t84.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t38.60%<\/td>\n\t\t19.30%<\/td>\n\t\t80.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t42.20%<\/td>\n\t\t28.20%<\/td>\n\t\t71.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Introduction of female quotas in elections Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 44.37% 19.60% 80.40% Berne 43.44% 16.40% 83.60% Lucerne 46.92% 15.70% 84.30% Uri 51.70% 13.00% 87.00% Schwyz 50.27% 11.30% 88.70% Obwald 43.91% 11.90% 88.10% Nidwald 44.36% 10.70% 89.30% Glaris 39.74% 13.50% 86.50% Zoug 46.80% 14.70% 85.30% Fribourg 40.52% 18.00% 82.00% Soleure 45.53% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}