{"id":576,"date":"2003-09-11T08:20:55","date_gmt":"2003-09-11T04:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-may-18-2003.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T08:23:35","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T04:23:35","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-may-18-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-may-18-2003.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of May 18 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"

Modification on Army XXI law<\/strong>
\nThe first provision will ask voters to approve a revision of a federal law (Army XXI) that aims at a reform of the Army (smaller and more professional).<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t51.77%<\/td>\n\t\t75.70%<\/td>\n\t\t24.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t48.61%<\/td>\n\t\t80.40%<\/td>\n\t\t19.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t53.62%<\/td>\n\t\t77.00%<\/td>\n\t\t23.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t47.90%<\/td>\n\t\t63.10%<\/td>\n\t\t36.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t55.32%<\/td>\n\t\t60.60%<\/td>\n\t\t39.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t52.90%<\/td>\n\t\t67.10%<\/td>\n\t\t32.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t55.18%<\/td>\n\t\t74.10%<\/td>\n\t\t25.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t48.29%<\/td>\n\t\t66.40%<\/td>\n\t\t33.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t57.27%<\/td>\n\t\t75.30%<\/td>\n\t\t24.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t48.02%<\/td>\n\t\t81.10%<\/td>\n\t\t18.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t55.30%<\/td>\n\t\t77.20%<\/td>\n\t\t22.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t53.13%<\/td>\n\t\t78.10%<\/td>\n\t\t21.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t50.38%<\/td>\n\t\t78.80%<\/td>\n\t\t21.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t69.12%<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t\t37.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t53.16%<\/td>\n\t\t74.80%<\/td>\n\t\t25.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.17%<\/td>\n\t\t69.80%<\/td>\n\t\t30.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t48.04%<\/td>\n\t\t73.00%<\/td>\n\t\t27.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t42.22%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t46.64%<\/td>\n\t\t75.40%<\/td>\n\t\t24.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t47.88%<\/td>\n\t\t70.00%<\/td>\n\t\t30.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t37.73%<\/td>\n\t\t73.30%<\/td>\n\t\t26.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t51.19%<\/td>\n\t\t82.10%<\/td>\n\t\t17.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t40.11%<\/td>\n\t\t68.80%<\/td>\n\t\t31.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t55.48%<\/td>\n\t\t82.00%<\/td>\n\t\t18.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t50.78%<\/td>\n\t\t75.20%<\/td>\n\t\t24.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t44.63%<\/td>\n\t\t74.00%<\/td>\n\t\t26.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t49.56%<\/td>\n\t\t76.00%<\/td>\n\t\t24.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Initiative to extend the moratorium on nuclear facilities <\/strong>
\nThe seventh provision sought public approval to extend the moratorium on building new nuclear facilities.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t51.91%<\/td>\n\t\t44.70%<\/td>\n\t\t55.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t48.61%<\/td>\n\t\t41.40%<\/td>\n\t\t58.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t53.60%<\/td>\n\t\t36.40%<\/td>\n\t\t63.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t48.12%<\/td>\n\t\t41.70%<\/td>\n\t\t58.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t55.31%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t52.87%<\/td>\n\t\t38.30%<\/td>\n\t\t61.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t55.41%<\/td>\n\t\t35.80%<\/td>\n\t\t64.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t48.36%<\/td>\n\t\t40.60%<\/td>\n\t\t59.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t57.26%<\/td>\n\t\t37.20%<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t48.03%<\/td>\n\t\t41.50%<\/td>\n\t\t58.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t55.33%<\/td>\n\t\t35.40%<\/td>\n\t\t64.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t53.35%<\/td>\n\t\t57.90%<\/td>\n\t\t42.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t50.49%<\/td>\n\t\t50.20%<\/td>\n\t\t49.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t69.19%<\/td>\n\t\t45.70%<\/td>\n\t\t54.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t53.17%<\/td>\n\t\t37.90%<\/td>\n\t\t62.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.23%<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t68.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t48.03%<\/td>\n\t\t38.00%<\/td>\n\t\t62.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t42.25%<\/td>\n\t\t42.80%<\/td>\n\t\t57.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t46.69%<\/td>\n\t\t32.20%<\/td>\n\t\t67.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t47.80%<\/td>\n\t\t35.20%<\/td>\n\t\t64.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t37.73%<\/td>\n\t\t49.20%<\/td>\n\t\t50.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t51.17%<\/td>\n\t\t44.20%<\/td>\n\t\t55.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t40.11%<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t68.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t55.42%<\/td>\n\t\t45.80%<\/td>\n\t\t54.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t50.78%<\/td>\n\t\t48.50%<\/td>\n\t\t51.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t44.69%<\/td>\n\t\t45.50%<\/td>\n\t\t54.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t49.59%<\/td>\n\t\t41.60%<\/td>\n\t\t58.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Initiative to shut down nuclear plants and seek energy alternatives<\/strong>
\nThe seventh and eight provisions sought public approval to extend the moratorium on building new nuclear facilities, shut down existing nuclear plants and to seek energy alternatives.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Switzerland. Referendum 2003.3<\/h2>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Yes<\/th>\n\t\t% Not<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t52.14%<\/td>\n\t\t34.70%<\/td>\n\t\t65.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Bern<\/td>\n\t\t48.61%<\/td>\n\t\t32.50%<\/td>\n\t\t67.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t53.79%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t48.45%<\/td>\n\t\t35.80%<\/td>\n\t\t64.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t55.38%<\/td>\n\t\t26.90%<\/td>\n\t\t73.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t53.07%<\/td>\n\t\t31.80%<\/td>\n\t\t68.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t55.52%<\/td>\n\t\t33.20%<\/td>\n\t\t66.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t48.41%<\/td>\n\t\t35.60%<\/td>\n\t\t64.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t57.35%<\/td>\n\t\t28.70%<\/td>\n\t\t71.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Freiburg<\/td>\n\t\t48.10%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t55.40%<\/td>\n\t\t26.60%<\/td>\n\t\t73.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Basle-city<\/td>\n\t\t53.56%<\/td>\n\t\t52.10%<\/td>\n\t\t47.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Basle-countryside<\/td>\n\t\t50.62%<\/td>\n\t\t42.10%<\/td>\n\t\t57.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t69.29%<\/td>\n\t\t35.70%<\/td>\n\t\t64.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodos-ext.<\/td>\n\t\t53.48%<\/td>\n\t\t31.40%<\/td>\n\t\t68.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodos-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t43.31%<\/td>\n\t\t25.00%<\/td>\n\t\t75.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t48.34%<\/td>\n\t\t29.80%<\/td>\n\t\t70.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t42.54%<\/td>\n\t\t35.40%<\/td>\n\t\t64.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t46.90%<\/td>\n\t\t23.40%<\/td>\n\t\t76.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t47.92%<\/td>\n\t\t26.70%<\/td>\n\t\t73.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t37.74%<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t51.21%<\/td>\n\t\t37.30%<\/td>\n\t\t62.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Were worth<\/td>\n\t\t40.11%<\/td>\n\t\t28.70%<\/td>\n\t\t71.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t55.51%<\/td>\n\t\t40.00%<\/td>\n\t\t60.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Geneva<\/td>\n\t\t50.78%<\/td>\n\t\t42.80%<\/td>\n\t\t57.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
The Jura<\/td>\n\t\t44.73%<\/td>\n\t\t42.00%<\/td>\n\t\t58.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t49.72%<\/td>\n\t\t33.70%<\/td>\n\t\t66.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Modification on Army XXI law The first provision will ask voters to approve a revision of a federal law (Army XXI) that aims at a reform of the Army (smaller and more professional). Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 51.77% 75.70% 24.30% Berne 48.61% 80.40% 19.60% Lucerne 53.62% 77.00% 23.00% Uri 47.90% 63.10% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/576"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=576"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/576\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=576"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=576"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=576"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}