{"id":575,"date":"2001-09-11T08:18:43","date_gmt":"2001-09-11T04:18:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-february-8-2004.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T08:20:55","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T04:20:55","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-february-8-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-february-8-2004.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of February 8 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"

Counter-project on the “Avante” initiative (for safe and effective motorways)<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t47.47%<\/td>\n\t\t37.60%<\/td>\n\t\t62.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t42.98%<\/td>\n\t\t35.70%<\/td>\n\t\t64.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t49%<\/td>\n\t\t37.60%<\/td>\n\t\t62.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t55.83%<\/td>\n\t\t26.40%<\/td>\n\t\t73.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t47.07%<\/td>\n\t\t41.70%<\/td>\n\t\t58.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t46.74%<\/td>\n\t\t37.20%<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t50.91%<\/td>\n\t\t35.70%<\/td>\n\t\t64.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t45.14%<\/td>\n\t\t30.30%<\/td>\n\t\t69.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t52.11%<\/td>\n\t\t41.70%<\/td>\n\t\t58.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t36.20%<\/td>\n\t\t63.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t47.30%<\/td>\n\t\t37.70%<\/td>\n\t\t62.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t52.76%<\/td>\n\t\t34.60%<\/td>\n\t\t65.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t48.87%<\/td>\n\t\t37.40%<\/td>\n\t\t62.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t63.75%<\/td>\n\t\t33.30%<\/td>\n\t\t66.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t55.62%<\/td>\n\t\t34.90%<\/td>\n\t\t65.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t37.53%<\/td>\n\t\t31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t68.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t42.53%<\/td>\n\t\t34.80%<\/td>\n\t\t65.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t36.60%<\/td>\n\t\t25.30%<\/td>\n\t\t74.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t39.98%<\/td>\n\t\t41.90%<\/td>\n\t\t58.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t38.18%<\/td>\n\t\t34.20%<\/td>\n\t\t65.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t44.27%<\/td>\n\t\t44.30%<\/td>\n\t\t55.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t49.79%<\/td>\n\t\t39.40%<\/td>\n\t\t60.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.25%<\/td>\n\t\t28.20%<\/td>\n\t\t71.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t56.34%<\/td>\n\t\t37.80%<\/td>\n\t\t62.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t56.07%<\/td>\n\t\t40.90%<\/td>\n\t\t59.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t35.98%<\/td>\n\t\t30.50%<\/td>\n\t\t69.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t45.58%<\/td>\n\t\t37.20%<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Counter-project on the “Avante” initiative (for safe and effective motorways) Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 47.47% 37.60% 62.40% Berne 42.98% 35.70% 64.30% Lucerne 49% 37.60% 62.40% Uri 55.83% 26.40% 73.60% Schwyz 47.07% 41.70% 58.30% Obwald 46.74% 37.20% 62.80% Nidwald 50.91% 35.70% 64.30% Glaris 45.14% 30.30% 69.70% Zoug 52.11% 41.70% 58.30% Fribourg 40.40% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}