{"id":572,"date":"2004-09-11T07:53:17","date_gmt":"2004-09-11T03:53:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-28-2004.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T07:56:38","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T03:56:38","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-november-28-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-28-2004.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of November 28 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"

Provision One: Allowing the restructuring of financial equalisation, and to redistribute federal responsibilities between the cantons.<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t37.56%<\/td>\n\t\t60.50%<\/td>\n\t\t39.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t36.15%<\/td>\n\t\t72.30%<\/td>\n\t\t27.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t44.73%<\/td>\n\t\t71.70%<\/td>\n\t\t28.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t35.40%<\/td>\n\t\t81.90%<\/td>\n\t\t18.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t38.66%<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t40.75%<\/td>\n\t\t71.00%<\/td>\n\t\t29.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t37.95%<\/td>\n\t\t46.00%<\/td>\n\t\t54.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t30.09%<\/td>\n\t\t60.90%<\/td>\n\t\t39.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t52.38%<\/td>\n\t\t16.30%<\/td>\n\t\t83.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t31.34%<\/td>\n\t\t68.40%<\/td>\n\t\t31.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t35.42%<\/td>\n\t\t71.40%<\/td>\n\t\t28.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t44.76%<\/td>\n\t\t75.50%<\/td>\n\t\t24.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t33.95%<\/td>\n\t\t63.20%<\/td>\n\t\t36.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t57.18%<\/td>\n\t\t63.70%<\/td>\n\t\t36.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t43.54%<\/td>\n\t\t67.10%<\/td>\n\t\t32.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t32.30%<\/td>\n\t\t70.40%<\/td>\n\t\t29.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t33.67%<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t28.31%<\/td>\n\t\t68.80%<\/td>\n\t\t31.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t35.22%<\/td>\n\t\t61.90%<\/td>\n\t\t38.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t33.93%<\/td>\n\t\t70.10%<\/td>\n\t\t29.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.44%<\/td>\n\t\t67.00%<\/td>\n\t\t33.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t36.76%<\/td>\n\t\t64.10%<\/td>\n\t\t35.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.64%<\/td>\n\t\t65.00%<\/td>\n\t\t35.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t41.75%<\/td>\n\t\t62.20%<\/td>\n\t\t37.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t41.08%<\/td>\n\t\t55.50%<\/td>\n\t\t44.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t45.47%<\/td>\n\t\t71.50%<\/td>\n\t\t28.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t36.85%<\/td>\n\t\t64.40%<\/td>\n\t\t35.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Stem Cell Research<\/strong>
\nProvision Three: Permits research on surplus embryos obtained through in-vitro fertilisation for therapeutic purposes and under strict regulations, into stem cells. Also strictly prohibits therapeutic cloning, the creation of embryos for the purpose of research and also the trading of embryos or stem cells.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t37.87%<\/td>\n\t\t66.40%<\/td>\n\t\t33.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t36.15%<\/td>\n\t\t61.70%<\/td>\n\t\t38.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t44.94%<\/td>\n\t\t60.80%<\/td>\n\t\t39.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t35.44%<\/td>\n\t\t57.50%<\/td>\n\t\t42.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t38.95%<\/td>\n\t\t56.80%<\/td>\n\t\t43.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t40.97%<\/td>\n\t\t56.30%<\/td>\n\t\t43.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t38.10%<\/td>\n\t\t60.50%<\/td>\n\t\t39.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t30.12%<\/td>\n\t\t61.20%<\/td>\n\t\t38.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t52.27%<\/td>\n\t\t62.50%<\/td>\n\t\t37.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t31.44%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t35.49%<\/td>\n\t\t64.30%<\/td>\n\t\t35.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t45.10%<\/td>\n\t\t68.20%<\/td>\n\t\t31.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t34.19%<\/td>\n\t\t69.40%<\/td>\n\t\t30.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t57.24%<\/td>\n\t\t62.80%<\/td>\n\t\t37.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t44.14%<\/td>\n\t\t60.70%<\/td>\n\t\t39.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t32.35%<\/td>\n\t\t55.70%<\/td>\n\t\t44.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t34.06%<\/td>\n\t\t59.40%<\/td>\n\t\t40.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t28.55%<\/td>\n\t\t61.90%<\/td>\n\t\t38.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t35.61%<\/td>\n\t\t64.10%<\/td>\n\t\t35.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t34.14%<\/td>\n\t\t59.50%<\/td>\n\t\t40.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t30.45%<\/td>\n\t\t68.00%<\/td>\n\t\t32.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t36.89%<\/td>\n\t\t83.90%<\/td>\n\t\t16.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t31.62%<\/td>\n\t\t53.70%<\/td>\n\t\t46.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t41.85%<\/td>\n\t\t75.00%<\/td>\n\t\t25.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t41.08%<\/td>\n\t\t84.60%<\/td>\n\t\t15.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t45.52%<\/td>\n\t\t70.70%<\/td>\n\t\t29.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Switzerland<\/td>\n\t\t37.03%<\/td>\n\t\t66.40%<\/td>\n\t\t33.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Provision One: Allowing the restructuring of financial equalisation, and to redistribute federal responsibilities between the cantons. Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non Zurich 37.56% 60.50% 39.50% Berne 36.15% 72.30% 27.70% Lucerne 44.73% 71.70% 28.30% Uri 35.40% 81.90% 18.10% Schwyz 38.66% 43.00% 57.00% Obwald 40.75% 71.00% 29.00% Nidwald 37.95% 46.00% 54.00% Glaris 30.09% 60.90% 39.10% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=572"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/572\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=572"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=572"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=572"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}