{"id":569,"date":"2005-09-11T06:11:46","date_gmt":"2005-09-11T02:11:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-27-2005.html"},"modified":"2007-09-11T07:49:22","modified_gmt":"2007-09-11T03:49:22","slug":"switzerland-referendum-of-november-27-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/switzerland\/switzerland-referendum-of-november-27-2005.html","title":{"rendered":"Switzerland. Referendum of November 27 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"

Referendum on a five-year ban on the use of genetically modified plants and animals in farming<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t42.24%<\/td>\n\t\t55.70%<\/td>\n\t\t44.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t43.70%<\/td>\n\t\t50.50%<\/td>\n\t\t49.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t38.57%<\/td>\n\t\t57.50%<\/td>\n\t\t42.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t46.72%<\/td>\n\t\t53.50%<\/td>\n\t\t46.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t36.59%<\/td>\n\t\t59.80%<\/td>\n\t\t40.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t43.83%<\/td>\n\t\t51.20%<\/td>\n\t\t48.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t46.41%<\/td>\n\t\t56.90%<\/td>\n\t\t43.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t41.36%<\/td>\n\t\t51.00%<\/td>\n\t\t49.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t32.33%<\/td>\n\t\t57.90%<\/td>\n\t\t42.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t50.41%<\/td>\n\t\t53.00%<\/td>\n\t\t47.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.38%<\/td>\n\t\t59.50%<\/td>\n\t\t40.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t39.48%<\/td>\n\t\t51.30%<\/td>\n\t\t48.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t47.16%<\/td>\n\t\t50.80%<\/td>\n\t\t49.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t38.15%<\/td>\n\t\t50.80%<\/td>\n\t\t49.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t61.19%<\/td>\n\t\t59.20%<\/td>\n\t\t40.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t46.42%<\/td>\n\t\t56.70%<\/td>\n\t\t43.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t36.83%<\/td>\n\t\t57.40%<\/td>\n\t\t42.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t40.57%<\/td>\n\t\t51.70%<\/td>\n\t\t48.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t37.51%<\/td>\n\t\t59.00%<\/td>\n\t\t41.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.73%<\/td>\n\t\t50.30%<\/td>\n\t\t49.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t38.36%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t36.91%<\/td>\n\t\t64.50%<\/td>\n\t\t35.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t44.24%<\/td>\n\t\t62.60%<\/td>\n\t\t37.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t44.19%<\/td>\n\t\t52.80%<\/td>\n\t\t47.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t50.53%<\/td>\n\t\t65.30%<\/td>\n\t\t34.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t47.44%<\/td>\n\t\t64.70%<\/td>\n\t\t35.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t41.15%<\/td>\n\t\t75.90%<\/td>\n\t\t24.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Suisse<\/td>\n\t\t42.24%<\/td>\n\t\t55.70%<\/td>\n\t\t44.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n

Referendum on “Law on Work”<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Canton<\/th>\n\t\t% Particip.<\/th>\n\t\t% Oui<\/th>\n\t\t% Non<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t42.31%<\/td>\n\t\t50.60%<\/td>\n\t\t49.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zurich<\/td>\n\t\t43.83%<\/td>\n\t\t62.70%<\/td>\n\t\t37.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Berne<\/td>\n\t\t38.57%<\/td>\n\t\t52.20%<\/td>\n\t\t47.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Lucerne<\/td>\n\t\t46.80%<\/td>\n\t\t43.50%<\/td>\n\t\t56.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Uri<\/td>\n\t\t36.63%<\/td>\n\t\t36.70%<\/td>\n\t\t63.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schwyz<\/td>\n\t\t43.92%<\/td>\n\t\t46.50%<\/td>\n\t\t53.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Obwald<\/td>\n\t\t46.50%<\/td>\n\t\t45.00%<\/td>\n\t\t55.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Nidwald<\/td>\n\t\t41.49%<\/td>\n\t\t48.60%<\/td>\n\t\t51.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Glaris<\/td>\n\t\t32.36%<\/td>\n\t\t48.90%<\/td>\n\t\t51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Zoug<\/td>\n\t\t50.62%<\/td>\n\t\t54.60%<\/td>\n\t\t45.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Fribourg<\/td>\n\t\t40.44%<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t59.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Soleure<\/td>\n\t\t39.55%<\/td>\n\t\t48.50%<\/td>\n\t\t51.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Ville<\/td>\n\t\t47.22%<\/td>\n\t\t58.80%<\/td>\n\t\t41.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
B?le-Campagne<\/td>\n\t\t38.21%<\/td>\n\t\t57.10%<\/td>\n\t\t42.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Schaffhouse<\/td>\n\t\t61.20%<\/td>\n\t\t47.60%<\/td>\n\t\t52.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Ext.<\/td>\n\t\t46.57%<\/td>\n\t\t48.30%<\/td>\n\t\t51.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Appenzell Rhodes-Int.<\/td>\n\t\t36.86%<\/td>\n\t\t38.60%<\/td>\n\t\t61.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Saint-Gall<\/td>\n\t\t40.80%<\/td>\n\t\t47.40%<\/td>\n\t\t52.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Grisons<\/td>\n\t\t37.42%<\/td>\n\t\t47.80%<\/td>\n\t\t52.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Argovie<\/td>\n\t\t40.80%<\/td>\n\t\t51.40%<\/td>\n\t\t48.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Thurgovie<\/td>\n\t\t38.40%<\/td>\n\t\t42.50%<\/td>\n\t\t57.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Tessin<\/td>\n\t\t36.91%<\/td>\n\t\t45.30%<\/td>\n\t\t54.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Vaud<\/td>\n\t\t44.34%<\/td>\n\t\t45.60%<\/td>\n\t\t54.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Valais<\/td>\n\t\t44.19%<\/td>\n\t\t34.60%<\/td>\n\t\t65.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Neuch?tel<\/td>\n\t\t50.56%<\/td>\n\t\t46.90%<\/td>\n\t\t53.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Gen?ve<\/td>\n\t\t47.44%<\/td>\n\t\t55.10%<\/td>\n\t\t44.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Jura<\/td>\n\t\t41.22%<\/td>\n\t\t21.20%<\/td>\n\t\t78.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
Suisse<\/td>\n\t\t42.31%<\/td>\n\t\t50.60%<\/td>\n\t\t49.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>

no images were found<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Referendum on a five-year ban on the use of genetically modified plants and animals in farming Canton % Particip. % Oui % Non TOTAL 42.24% 55.70% 44.30% Zurich 43.70% 50.50% 49.50% Berne 38.57% 57.50% 42.50% Lucerne 46.72% 53.50% 46.50% Uri 36.59% 59.80% 40.20% Schwyz 43.83% 51.20% 48.80% Obwald 46.41% 56.90% 43.10% Nidwald 41.36% 51.00% 49.00% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/569"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/569\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}