{"id":545,"date":"2005-09-10T05:01:27","date_gmt":"2005-09-10T01:01:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/s\/suriname\/suriname-legislative-election-2005.html"},"modified":"2007-09-10T05:02:50","modified_gmt":"2007-09-10T01:02:50","slug":"suriname-legislative-election-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/suriname\/suriname-legislative-election-2005.html","title":{"rendered":"Suriname. Legislative Election 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<table class=\"rowstyle-alt\" id=\"wptable\" >\n\t<thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">Provinces<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">ABOP-BEP<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">Alternative 1<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">National Democratic Party (NDP)<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">New Front for Democracy (NFD)<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">People?s Alliance for Progress (VVV)<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">7.00%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">6.30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">22.80%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">41.50%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">14.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">1. Brokopondo<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">28.00%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">1.00%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">17.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">10.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">2. Commewijne<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">1.30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">1.90%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">8.00%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">49.40%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">25.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">3. Coronie<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" >&nbsp;<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" >&nbsp;<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">28.10%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">26.10%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">19.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">4. Marowijne<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">48.30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">3.20%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">13.20%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">25.90%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">9.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">5. Nickerie<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" >&nbsp;<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">16.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">16.40%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">36.60%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">14.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">6. Para<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">4.10%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">4.30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">35.50%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">38.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">17.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">7. Paramaribo<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">7.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">4.80%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">25.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">41.70%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">12.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">8. Saramacca<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" >&nbsp;<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">21.60%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">25.80%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">36.10%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">14.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">9. Sipaliwini<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">7.20%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">2.20%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">30.50%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">15.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:100px\" align=\"left\">10. Wanica<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">4.20%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">5.60%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">19.90%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">47.60%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">15.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table><p>\n<\/p><!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-7e5b0686acb764652beb6b8918329196-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/suriname2005\/2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n               title=\"Suriname. Legislative Election 2005\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/suriname2005\/2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/suriname2005\/thumbs\/thumbs_2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n               data-image-id=\"690\"\n               data-title=\"2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n               data-description=\"Suriname. Legislative Election 2005\"\n               data-image-slug=\"2005-suriname-legislative-gif\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"7e5b0686acb764652beb6b8918329196\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n                    alt=\"2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/suriname2005\/thumbs\/thumbs_2005-suriname-legislative.gif\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Provinces ABOP-BEP Alternative 1 National Democratic Party (NDP) New Front for Democracy (NFD) People?s Alliance for Progress (VVV) TOTAL 7.00% 6.30% 22.80% 41.50% 14.60% 1. Brokopondo 28.00% 1.00% 17.70% 40.40% 10.90% 2. Commewijne 1.30% 1.90% 8.00% 49.40% 25.60% 3. Coronie &nbsp; &nbsp; 28.10% 26.10% 19.10% 4. Marowijne 48.30% 3.20% 13.20% 25.90% 9.50% 5. Nickerie &nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[155],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/545\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}