<\/p>\n
| Constituencies<\/th>\n\t\t | Saint Lucia Labour Party<\/th>\n\t\t | United Workers Party<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t |
|---|---|---|
| TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t | 56.00%<\/td>\n\t\t | 37.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Gros<\/td>\n\t\t | 52.20%<\/td>\n\t\t | 47.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Babonneau<\/td>\n\t\t | 58.40%<\/td>\n\t\t | 40.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 53.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 41.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 62.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 34.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 50.80%<\/td>\n\t\t | 44.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 55.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 39.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Anse<\/td>\n\t\t | 58.60%<\/td>\n\t\t | 7.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Soufriere<\/td>\n\t\t | 66.30%<\/td>\n\t\t | 33.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Choisuel<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.60%<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Laborie<\/td>\n\t\t | 57.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | <\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Vieux<\/td>\n\t\t | 73.30%<\/td>\n\t\t | 26.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Vieux<\/td>\n\t\t | 73.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 26.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Micoud<\/td>\n\t\t | 39.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 55.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Micoud<\/td>\n\t\t | 41.60%<\/td>\n\t\t | 58.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Dennery<\/td>\n\t\t | 62.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 35.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Dennery<\/td>\n\t\t | 46.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 53.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 57.60%<\/td>\n\t\t | 34.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table> \n<\/p>\n |
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Constituencies Saint Lucia Labour Party United Workers Party TOTAL 56.00% 37.80% Gros 52.20% 47.20% Babonneau 58.40% 40.60% Castries 53.50% 41.70% Castries 62.50% 34.40% Castries 50.80% 44.70% Castries 55.50% 39.30% Anse 58.60% 7.20% Soufriere 66.30% 33.70% Choisuel 51.60% 48.40% Laborie 57.50% Vieux 73.30% 26.70% Vieux 73.90% 26.10% Micoud 39.90% 55.30% Micoud 41.60% 58.40% Dennery 62.50% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[141],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=469"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/469\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=469"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=469"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=469"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/saintlucia2001\/2001-saint-lucia-legislative.gif\"\n){kind=link}