<\/p>\n
| Constituencies<\/th>\n\t\t | Saint Lucia Labour Party<\/th>\n\t\t | United Workers Party<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t |
|---|---|---|
| TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.20%<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.40%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Gros<\/td>\n\t\t | 44.40%<\/td>\n\t\t | 56.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Babonneau<\/td>\n\t\t | 46.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 53.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 41.10%<\/td>\n\t\t | 58.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.30%<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 41.20%<\/td>\n\t\t | 58.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 46.00%<\/td>\n\t\t | 54.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Anse<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.80%<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Soufriere<\/td>\n\t\t | 43.70%<\/td>\n\t\t | 56.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Choisuel<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.00%<\/td>\n\t\t | 49.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Laborie<\/td>\n\t\t | 35.80%<\/td>\n\t\t | 64.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Vieux<\/td>\n\t\t | 57.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 42.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Vieux<\/td>\n\t\t | 67.10%<\/td>\n\t\t | 32.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Micoud<\/td>\n\t\t | 31.70%<\/td>\n\t\t | 64.20%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Micoud<\/td>\n\t\t | 63.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 32.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Dennery<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.50%<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Dennery<\/td>\n\t\t | 51.90%<\/td>\n\t\t | 48.10%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Castries<\/td>\n\t\t | 53.40%<\/td>\n\t\t | 46.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table> \n<\/p>\n |
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Constituencies Saint Lucia Labour Party United Workers Party TOTAL 48.20% 51.40% Gros 44.40% 56.60% Babonneau 46.90% 53.10% Castries 41.10% 58.90% Castries 48.30% 51.70% Castries 41.20% 58.80% Castries 46.00% 54.00% Anse 48.80% 51.10% Soufriere 43.70% 56.30% Choisuel 51.00% 49.00% Laborie 35.80% 64.20% Vieux 57.50% 42.50% Vieux 67.10% 32.90% Micoud 31.70% 64.20% Micoud 63.90% 32.90% Dennery 48.50% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[141],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/saintlucia2006\/2006-st-lucia-legislative.gif\"\n){kind=link}