{"id":4592,"date":"2016-10-03T19:09:08","date_gmt":"2016-10-03T16:09:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/?p=4592"},"modified":"2016-10-03T19:09:08","modified_gmt":"2016-10-03T16:09:08","slug":"hungary-migrant-quota-referendum-2016","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/h\/hungary\/hungary-migrant-quota-referendum-2016.html","title":{"rendered":"Hungary. Migrant Quota Referendum 2016"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>YES 1,67%<br \/>\nNO 98,33%<br \/>\nTURNOUT 43,35%<\/p><!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-11dca3498fc6f0457960592744872c9a-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/hungary2016\/hungary2016.png\"\n               title=\"\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/hungary2016\/hungary2016.png\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/hungary2016\/thumbs\/thumbs_hungary2016.png\"\n               data-image-id=\"3966\"\n               data-title=\"hungary2016\"\n               data-description=\"\"\n               data-image-slug=\"hungary2016\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"11dca3498fc6f0457960592744872c9a\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"hungary2016\"\n                    alt=\"hungary2016\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/hungary2016\/thumbs\/thumbs_hungary2016.png\"\n                    width=\"150\"\n                    height=\"100\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>YES 1,67% NO 98,33% TURNOUT 43,35%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[89],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4592"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4592"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4597,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4592\/revisions\/4597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}