{"id":432,"date":"1998-09-07T05:36:48","date_gmt":"1998-09-07T01:36:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/p\/portugal\/portugal-referendum-on-administrative-regions-1998.html"},"modified":"2007-09-07T05:37:47","modified_gmt":"2007-09-07T01:37:47","slug":"portugal-referendum-on-administrative-regions-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/p\/portugal\/portugal-referendum-on-administrative-regions-1998.html","title":{"rendered":"Portugal. Referendum on Administrative Regions 1998"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<table class=\"rowstyle-alt\" id=\"wptable\" >\n\t<thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Provinces<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">YES<\/th>\n\t\t<th class=\"sortable-numeric\" style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">NO<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Total<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">36.49%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">63.51%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Aveiro<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">23.76%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">76.24%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Beja<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">59.36%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">40.64%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Braga<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">33.84%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">66.16%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Braganca<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">34.01%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">65.99%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Castell Branco<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">33.09%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">66.91%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Coimbra<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">31.50%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">68.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Evora<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">57.27%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">42.73%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Faro<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">45.56%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">54.44%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Guarda<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">18.15%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">81.85%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Leiria<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">19.88%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">80.12%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Lisboa<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">37.16%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">62.84%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Portalegre<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">44.30%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">55.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Porto<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">45.19%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">54.81%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Santarem<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">31.09%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">68.91%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Setubal<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">52.33%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">47.67%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Viano Do Castelo<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">31.59%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">68.41%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Vila Real<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">31.62%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">68.38%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Viseu<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">20.98%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">79.02%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr class=\"alt\">\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Acores<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">38.44%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">61.56%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<tr>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:120px\" align=\"left\">Madeira<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">29.25%<\/td>\n\t\t<td style=\"width:30px\" align=\"center\">70.75%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table><p>\n<\/p><!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-f7f164bceeb6f2ca60b19b94c549f7fe-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/portugal1998r2\/1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n               title=\"Portugal. Administrative Referendum 1998 map\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/portugal1998r2\/1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/portugal1998r2\/thumbs\/thumbs_1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n               data-image-id=\"366\"\n               data-title=\"1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n               data-description=\"Portugal. Administrative Referendum 1998 map\"\n               data-image-slug=\"1998-portigal-referendum-administrative-png\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"f7f164bceeb6f2ca60b19b94c549f7fe\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n                    alt=\"1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/portugal1998r2\/thumbs\/thumbs_1998-portigal-referendum-administrative.png\"\n                    width=\"170\"\n                    height=\"170\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Provinces YES NO Total 36.49% 63.51% Aveiro 23.76% 76.24% Beja 59.36% 40.64% Braga 33.84% 66.16% Braganca 34.01% 65.99% Castell Branco 33.09% 66.91% Coimbra 31.50% 68.50% Evora 57.27% 42.73% Faro 45.56% 54.44% Guarda 18.15% 81.85% Leiria 19.88% 80.12% Lisboa 37.16% 62.84% Portalegre 44.30% 55.70% Porto 45.19% 54.81% Santarem 31.09% 68.91% Setubal 52.33% 47.67% Viano Do Castelo [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[135],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=432"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/432\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=432"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=432"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=432"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}