| vojevodships<\/td>\n | Turnout (%) <\/td>\n | YES (%) <\/td>\n | NO (%) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n| 42.86<\/strong><\/td>\n | 52.71<\/strong><\/td>\n | 45.89<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | warszawskie<\/td>\n | 51.18<\/td>\n | 49.52<\/td>\n | 49.44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | bialskopodlaskie<\/td>\n | 39.29<\/td>\n | 46.78<\/td>\n | 51.42<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | bia\u0142ostockie<\/td>\n | 48.33<\/td>\n | 44.24<\/td>\n | 54.58<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | bielskie<\/td>\n | 50.25<\/td>\n | 46.85<\/td>\n | 51.74<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | bydgoskie<\/td>\n | 44.13<\/td>\n | 60.71<\/td>\n | 37.95<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | che\u0142mskie<\/td>\n | 36.56<\/td>\n | 58.55<\/td>\n | 39.61<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ciechanowskie<\/td>\n | 32.46<\/td>\n | 59.59<\/td>\n | 38.5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | cz\u0119stochowskie<\/td>\n | 39.84<\/td>\n | 60.14<\/td>\n | 38.39<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | elbl\u0105skie<\/td>\n | 36.2<\/td>\n | 62.52<\/td>\n | 36.09<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | gda\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 47.91<\/td>\n | 42.21<\/td>\n | 56.59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | gorzowskie<\/td>\n | 38.34<\/td>\n | 66.78<\/td>\n | 31.82<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | jeleniog\u00f3rskie<\/td>\n | 40.53<\/td>\n | 63.21<\/td>\n | 35.43<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | kaliskie<\/td>\n | 43.2<\/td>\n | 59.79<\/td>\n | 38.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | katowickie<\/td>\n | 40.84<\/td>\n | 59.99<\/td>\n | 38.88<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | kieleckie<\/td>\n | 37.42<\/td>\n | 62.15<\/td>\n | 36.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | koni\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 35.86<\/td>\n | 60.91<\/td>\n | 37.29<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | koszali\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 39.29<\/td>\n | 67.89<\/td>\n | 30.9<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | krakowskie<\/td>\n | 47.63<\/td>\n | 42.58<\/td>\n | 56.24<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | kro\u015bnie\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 51.29<\/td>\n | 31.64<\/td>\n | 66.89<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | legnickie<\/td>\n | 41.27<\/td>\n | 60.96<\/td>\n | 37.75<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | leszczy\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 43.29<\/td>\n | 62.23<\/td>\n | 35.84<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | lubelskie<\/td>\n | 43.95<\/td>\n | 46.96<\/td>\n | 51.71<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \u0142om\u017cy\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 43.38<\/td>\n | 31.71<\/td>\n | 66.44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \u0142\u00f3dzkie<\/td>\n | 46.09<\/td>\n | 62.73<\/td>\n | 36.09<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | nowos\u0105deckie<\/td>\n | 50.03<\/td>\n | 25.84<\/td>\n | 72.44<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | olszty\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 37.23<\/td>\n | 62.68<\/td>\n | 35.94<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | opolskie<\/td>\n | 35.28<\/td>\n | 52.44<\/td>\n | 46.09<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ostro\u0142\u0119ckie<\/td>\n | 39.33<\/td>\n | 38.88<\/td>\n | 59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | pilskie<\/td>\n | 42.38<\/td>\n | 62.91<\/td>\n | 35.34<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | piotrkowskie<\/td>\n | 37.29<\/td>\n | 53.97<\/td>\n | 44.37<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | p\u0142ockie<\/td>\n | 34.64<\/td>\n | 63.88<\/td>\n | 34.43<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | pozna\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 47.69<\/td>\n | 59.19<\/td>\n | 39.51<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | przemyskie<\/td>\n | 48.74<\/td>\n | 32.82<\/td>\n | 65.59<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | radomskie<\/td>\n | 36.36<\/td>\n | 49.86<\/td>\n | 48.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | rzeszowskie<\/td>\n | 57.65<\/td>\n | 26.76<\/td>\n | 71.83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | siedleckie<\/td>\n | 37.03<\/td>\n | 44.76<\/td>\n | 53.04<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | sieradzkie<\/td>\n | 37.43<\/td>\n | 60.25<\/td>\n | 37.87<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | skierniewickie<\/td>\n | 34.91<\/td>\n | 56.77<\/td>\n | 41.39<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | s\u0142upskie<\/td>\n | 38.45<\/td>\n | 61.29<\/td>\n | 37.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | suwalskie<\/td>\n | 35.72<\/td>\n | 53.23<\/td>\n | 45.35<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | szczeci\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 40.54<\/td>\n | 64.2<\/td>\n | 34.72<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | tarnobrzeskie<\/td>\n | 42.68<\/td>\n | 44.04<\/td>\n | 54.37<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | tarnowskie<\/td>\n | 46.56<\/td>\n | 31.07<\/td>\n | 67.12<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | toru\u0144skie<\/td>\n | 39.67<\/td>\n | 58.83<\/td>\n | 39.83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | wa\u0142brzyskie<\/td>\n | 41.43<\/td>\n | 62.81<\/td>\n | 35.83<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | w\u0142oc\u0142awskie<\/td>\n | 35.83<\/td>\n | 65.09<\/td>\n | 33.34<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | wroc\u0142awskie<\/td>\n | 46.24<\/td>\n | 52.51<\/td>\n | 46.36<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | zamojskie<\/td>\n | 41.83<\/td>\n | 43.85<\/td>\n | 54.33<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | zielonog\u00f3rskie<\/td>\n | 41.35<\/td>\n | 64.28<\/td>\n | 34.29<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | |
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"vojevodships Turnout (%) YES (%) NO (%) TOTAL 42.86 52.71 45.89 warszawskie 51.18 49.52 49.44 bialskopodlaskie 39.29 46.78 51.42 bia\u0142ostockie 48.33 44.24 54.58 bielskie 50.25 46.85 51.74 bydgoskie 44.13 60.71 37.95 che\u0142mskie 36.56 58.55 39.61 ciechanowskie 32.46 59.59 38.5 cz\u0119stochowskie 39.84 60.14 38.39 elbl\u0105skie 36.2 62.52 36.09 gda\u0144skie 47.91 42.21 56.59 gorzowskie 38.34 66.78 31.82 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland1997r\/1997-poland-contitutional-referendum.gif\"\n){kind=link}