<\/p>\n
| Voivodeship<\/th>\n\t\t | Kwasniewski (%)<\/th>\n\t\t | Olechowski (%)<\/th>\n\t\t | Krzaklewski (%)<\/th>\n\t\t | Kalinowski (%)<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Silesian<\/td>\n\t\t | 59.37<\/td>\n\t\t | 17.29<\/td>\n\t\t | 14.27<\/td>\n\t\t | 2.77<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Kuyavian-Pomeranian<\/td>\n\t\t | 63.77<\/td>\n\t\t | 13.48<\/td>\n\t\t | 11.17<\/td>\n\t\t | 4.87<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Lublin<\/td>\n\t\t | 44.58<\/td>\n\t\t | 12.29<\/td>\n\t\t | 16.33<\/td>\n\t\t | 16.85<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Lubusz<\/td>\n\t\t | 65.83<\/td>\n\t\t | 14.13<\/td>\n\t\t | 11.93<\/td>\n\t\t | 2.6<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| L?dz<\/td>\n\t\t | 56.38<\/td>\n\t\t | 14.64<\/td>\n\t\t | 12.55<\/td>\n\t\t | 7.72<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Lesser Poland<\/td>\n\t\t | 41.49<\/td>\n\t\t | 23.81<\/td>\n\t\t | 22.13<\/td>\n\t\t | 5.21<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Masovian<\/td>\n\t\t | 46.5<\/td>\n\t\t | 20.71<\/td>\n\t\t | 16.91<\/td>\n\t\t | 8.17<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Opole<\/td>\n\t\t | 54.8<\/td>\n\t\t | 18.86<\/td>\n\t\t | 14.98<\/td>\n\t\t | 3.72<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Subcarpathian<\/td>\n\t\t | 39.34<\/td>\n\t\t | 15.06<\/td>\n\t\t | 26.64<\/td>\n\t\t | 9.57<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Podlasie<\/td>\n\t\t | 44.96<\/td>\n\t\t | 13.54<\/td>\n\t\t | 22.46<\/td>\n\t\t | 10.91<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Pomeranian<\/td>\n\t\t | 49.57<\/td>\n\t\t | 23.42<\/td>\n\t\t | 17.45<\/td>\n\t\t | 2.6<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Silesian<\/td>\n\t\t | 59.56<\/td>\n\t\t | 18.49<\/td>\n\t\t | 14.17<\/td>\n\t\t | 1.85<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Swietokrzyskie<\/td>\n\t\t | 60.51<\/td>\n\t\t | 10.84<\/td>\n\t\t | 10.61<\/td>\n\t\t | 10.3<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Warmian-Masurian<\/td>\n\t\t | 63.67<\/td>\n\t\t | 13.76<\/td>\n\t\t | 11.84<\/td>\n\t\t | 4.31<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Greater Poland<\/td>\n\t\t | 61.54<\/td>\n\t\t | 15.46<\/td>\n\t\t | 11.09<\/td>\n\t\t | 5.29<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| West Pomeranian<\/td>\n\t\t | 64.01<\/td>\n\t\t | 16.18<\/td>\n\t\t | 11.12<\/td>\n\t\t | 2.25<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t |
| Total<\/td>\n\t\t | 53.9<\/td>\n\t\t | 17.3<\/td>\n\t\t | 15.97<\/td>\n\t\t | 5.95<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table> \n<\/p>\n |
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voivodeship Kwasniewski (%) Olechowski (%) Krzaklewski (%) Kalinowski (%) Lower Silesian 59.37 17.29 14.27 2.77 Kuyavian-Pomeranian 63.77 13.48 11.17 4.87 Lublin 44.58 12.29 16.33 16.85 Lubusz 65.83 14.13 11.93 2.6 L?dz 56.38 14.64 12.55 7.72 Lesser Poland 41.49 23.81 22.13 5.21 Masovian 46.5 20.71 16.91 8.17 Opole 54.8 18.86 14.98 3.72 Subcarpathian 39.34 15.06 26.64 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2000\/2000-poland-presidential-kalinowski.png\"\n){kind=link}
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voivodeship Kwasniewski (%) Olechowski (%) Krzaklewski (%) Kalinowski (%) Lower Silesian 59.37 17.29 14.27 2.77 Kuyavian-Pomeranian 63.77 13.48 11.17 4.87 Lublin 44.58 12.29 16.33 16.85 Lubusz 65.83 14.13 11.93 2.6 L?dz 56.38 14.64 12.55 7.72 Lesser Poland 41.49 23.81 22.13 5.21 Masovian 46.5 20.71 16.91 8.17 Opole 54.8 18.86 14.98 3.72 Subcarpathian 39.34 15.06 26.64 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2000\/2000-poland-presidential-lrzaklewski.png\"\n){kind=link}
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voivodeship Kwasniewski (%) Olechowski (%) Krzaklewski (%) Kalinowski (%) Lower Silesian 59.37 17.29 14.27 2.77 Kuyavian-Pomeranian 63.77 13.48 11.17 4.87 Lublin 44.58 12.29 16.33 16.85 Lubusz 65.83 14.13 11.93 2.6 L?dz 56.38 14.64 12.55 7.72 Lesser Poland 41.49 23.81 22.13 5.21 Masovian 46.5 20.71 16.91 8.17 Opole 54.8 18.86 14.98 3.72 Subcarpathian 39.34 15.06 26.64 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2000\/2000-poland-presidential-olechowski.png\"\n){kind=link}
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t \n \n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voivodeship Kwasniewski (%) Olechowski (%) Krzaklewski (%) Kalinowski (%) Lower Silesian 59.37 17.29 14.27 2.77 Kuyavian-Pomeranian 63.77 13.48 11.17 4.87 Lublin 44.58 12.29 16.33 16.85 Lubusz 65.83 14.13 11.93 2.6 L?dz 56.38 14.64 12.55 7.72 Lesser Poland 41.49 23.81 22.13 5.21 Masovian 46.5 20.71 16.91 8.17 Opole 54.8 18.86 14.98 3.72 Subcarpathian 39.34 15.06 26.64 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2000\/2000-poland-presidential-kwasnewski.png\"\n){kind=link}
![\n \n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n \n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t<\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Voivodeship Kwasniewski (%) Olechowski (%) Krzaklewski (%) Kalinowski (%) Lower Silesian 59.37 17.29 14.27 2.77 Kuyavian-Pomeranian 63.77 13.48 11.17 4.87 Lublin 44.58 12.29 16.33 16.85 Lubusz 65.83 14.13 11.93 2.6 L?dz 56.38 14.64 12.55 7.72 Lesser Poland 41.49 23.81 22.13 5.21 Masovian 46.5 20.71 16.91 8.17 Opole 54.8 18.86 14.98 3.72 Subcarpathian 39.34 15.06 26.64 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}](\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2000\/2000-poland-presidential.png\"\n){kind=link}