{"id":396,"date":"2003-09-07T01:03:02","date_gmt":"2003-09-06T21:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/p\/poland\/poland-european-union-referendum-2003.html"},"modified":"2007-09-20T04:00:42","modified_gmt":"2007-09-20T00:00:42","slug":"poland-european-union-referendum-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/p\/poland\/poland-european-union-referendum-2003.html","title":{"rendered":"Poland. European Union Referendum 2003"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\">\n<col width=\"106\">\n<col width=\"86\">\n<col width=\"64\">\n<tbody>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_header\" height=\"48\" width=\"131\">Vojevodships<\/td>\n<td class=\"tbl_header\" width=\"96\">YES<\/td>\n<td class=\"tbl_header\" width=\"71\">NO<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Dolno\u015bl\u0105skie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">83.66%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">16.34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Kujawsko &#8211;    Pomorskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">77.11%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">22.89%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Lubelskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">63.25%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">36.75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Lubuskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">84.02%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">15.98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">\u0141\u00f3dzkie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">71.34%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">28.66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Ma\u0142opolskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">76.15%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">23.85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Mazowieckie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">74.23%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">25.77%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Opolskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">84.88%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">15.12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Podkarpackie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">70.08%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">29.92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Podlaskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">68.63%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">31.37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Pomorskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">80.24%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">19.76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">\u015al\u0105skie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">84.51%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">15.49%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">\u015awi\u0119tokrzyskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">75.76%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">24.24%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Warmi\u0144sko &#8211;    Mazurskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">81.72%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">18.28%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Wielkopolskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">77.13%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">22.87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Zachodniopomorskie&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">84.46%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">15.54%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Abroad<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">88.68%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">11.32%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\">Ships<\/td>\n<td width=\"96\">86.31%<\/td>\n<td width=\"71\">13.69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr height=\"16\">\n<td class=\"tbl_names\" height=\"16\" width=\"131\"><strong>TOTAL<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"96\"><strong>77.45%<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"71\"><strong>22.55%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><!-- index.php -->\n<div\n\tclass=\"ngg-galleryoverview\"\n\tid=\"ngg-gallery-9eea55ee6fe14c4d72106db10d869e6b-1\">\n\n    \t\t<!-- Thumbnails -->\n\t\t\t\t<div id=\"ngg-image-0\" class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail-box\" >\n\t\t\t\t        <div class=\"ngg-gallery-thumbnail\">\n            <a href=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2003\/2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n               title=\"Poland. European Union Referendum 2003 map\"\n               data-src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2003\/2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n               data-thumbnail=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2003\/thumbs\/thumbs_2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n               data-image-id=\"334\"\n               data-title=\"2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n               data-description=\"Poland. European Union Referendum 2003 map\"\n               data-image-slug=\"2003-poland-referendum-european-union-gif\"\n               class=\"ngg-simplelightbox\" rel=\"9eea55ee6fe14c4d72106db10d869e6b\">\n                <img\n                    title=\"2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n                    alt=\"2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n                    src=\"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-content\/gallery\/poland2003\/thumbs\/thumbs_2003-poland-referendum-european-union.gif\"\n                    width=\"170\"\n                    height=\"170\"\n                    style=\"max-width:100%;\"\n                \/>\n            <\/a>\n        <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t\t\n        \n\t\t\n\t\t<!-- Pagination -->\n\t<div class='ngg-clear'><\/div>\t<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vojevodships YES NO Dolno\u015bl\u0105skie&nbsp; 83.66% 16.34% Kujawsko &#8211; Pomorskie&nbsp; 77.11% 22.89% Lubelskie&nbsp; 63.25% 36.75% Lubuskie&nbsp; 84.02% 15.98% \u0141\u00f3dzkie&nbsp; 71.34% 28.66% Ma\u0142opolskie&nbsp; 76.15% 23.85% Mazowieckie&nbsp; 74.23% 25.77% Opolskie&nbsp; 84.88% 15.12% Podkarpackie&nbsp; 70.08% 29.92% Podlaskie&nbsp; 68.63% 31.37% Pomorskie&nbsp; 80.24% 19.76% \u015al\u0105skie&nbsp; 84.51% 15.49% \u015awi\u0119tokrzyskie&nbsp; 75.76% 24.24% Warmi\u0144sko &#8211; Mazurskie&nbsp; 81.72% 18.28% Wielkopolskie&nbsp; 77.13% 22.87% Zachodniopomorskie&nbsp; 84.46% 15.54% [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[134],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}