{"id":304,"date":"1999-09-05T23:24:10","date_gmt":"1999-09-05T19:24:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ukrupnenie.com\/countries\/m\/mozambique\/mozambique-presidential-election-1999.html"},"modified":"2007-09-05T23:25:00","modified_gmt":"2007-09-05T19:25:00","slug":"mozambique-presidential-election-1999","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/m\/mozambique\/mozambique-presidential-election-1999.html","title":{"rendered":"Mozambique. Presidential Election 1999"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t
Provinces<\/th>\n\t\tJoaquim Alberto CHISSANO<\/th>\n\t\tAfonso Marceta M Dhlakama<\/th>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t<\/thead>\n\t
TOTAL<\/td>\n\t\t52.30%<\/td>\n\t\t47.70%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
1. Cabo Delgado<\/td>\n\t\t66.50%<\/td>\n\t\t33.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
2. Gaza<\/td>\n\t\t95.10%<\/td>\n\t\t4.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
3. Inhambane<\/td>\n\t\t71.10%<\/td>\n\t\t28.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
4. Manica<\/td>\n\t\t34.00%<\/td>\n\t\t66.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
5. Maputo (city)<\/td>\n\t\t86.70%<\/td>\n\t\t13.30%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
6. Maputo<\/td>\n\t\t90.00%<\/td>\n\t\t10.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
7. Nampula<\/td>\n\t\t44.20%<\/td>\n\t\t55.80%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
8. Niassa<\/td>\n\t\t43.00%<\/td>\n\t\t57.00%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
9. Sofala<\/td>\n\t\t20.10%<\/td>\n\t\t79.90%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
10. Tete<\/td>\n\t\t40.40%<\/td>\n\t\t59.60%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n\t
11. Zambezia<\/td>\n\t\t29.50%<\/td>\n\t\t70.50%<\/td>\n\t<\/tr>\n<\/table>

\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Provinces Joaquim Alberto CHISSANO Afonso Marceta M Dhlakama TOTAL 52.30% 47.70% 1. Cabo Delgado 66.50% 33.50% 2. Gaza 95.10% 4.90% 3. Inhambane 71.10% 28.90% 4. Manica 34.00% 66.00% 5. Maputo (city) 86.70% 13.30% 6. Maputo 90.00% 10.00% 7. Nampula 44.20% 55.80% 8. Niassa 43.00% 57.00% 9. Sofala 20.10% 79.90% 10. Tete 40.40% 59.60% 11. Zambezia […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[120],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}