{"id":1130,"date":"2009-11-29T23:03:35","date_gmt":"2009-11-29T20:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/m\/mozambique\/mozambique-presidential-election-2009.html"},"modified":"2009-11-29T23:03:35","modified_gmt":"2009-11-29T20:03:35","slug":"mozambique-presidential-election-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/m\/mozambique\/mozambique-presidential-election-2009.html","title":{"rendered":"Mozambique. Presidential Election 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n Simango<\/td>\n\n Guebuza<\/td>\n\n Dhlakama<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n TOTAL<\/td>\n\n 8.59%<\/td>\n\n 75.00%<\/td>\n\n 16.41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 1. Cabo Delgado<\/td>\n\n 5.80%<\/td>\n\n 80.66%<\/td>\n\n 13.54%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 2. Gaza<\/td>\n\n 3.28%<\/td>\n\n 95.79%<\/td>\n\n 0.93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 3. Inhambane<\/td>\n\n 7.82%<\/td>\n\n 86.44%<\/td>\n\n 5.74%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 4. Manica<\/td>\n\n 7.35%<\/td>\n\n 70.39%<\/td>\n\n 22.16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 5. Maputo (city)<\/td>\n\n 14.90%<\/td>\n\n 80.30%<\/td>\n\n 4.37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 6. Maputo<\/td>\n\n 9.66%<\/td>\n\n 86.11%<\/td>\n\n 4.23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 7. Nampula<\/td>\n\n 5.86%<\/td>\n\n 66.63%<\/td>\n\n 27.51%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 8. Niassa<\/td>\n\n 5.06%<\/td>\n\n 82.09%<\/td>\n\n 12.85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 9. Sofala<\/td>\n\n 25.93%<\/td>\n\n 51.49%<\/td>\n\n 22.57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 10. Tete<\/td>\n\n 5.83%<\/td>\n\n 85.87%<\/td>\n\n 8.80%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n 11. Zambezia<\/td>\n\n 6.91%<\/td>\n\n 54.05%<\/td>\n\n 39.04%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Simango Guebuza Dhlakama TOTAL 8.59% 75.00% 16.41% 1. Cabo Delgado 5.80% 80.66% 13.54% 2. Gaza 3.28% 95.79% 0.93% 3. Inhambane 7.82% 86.44% 5.74% 4. Manica 7.35% 70.39% 22.16% 5. Maputo (city) 14.90% 80.30% 4.37% 6. Maputo 9.66% 86.11% 4.23% 7. Nampula 5.86% 66.63% 27.51% 8. Niassa 5.06% 82.09% 12.85% 9. Sofala 25.93% 51.49% 22.57% 10. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0},"categories":[120],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1130"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1130"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1130\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1130"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1130"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1130"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}