{"id":1016,"date":"2008-11-18T14:40:34","date_gmt":"2008-11-18T11:40:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/san-marino\/san-marino-legislative-election-2008.html"},"modified":"2008-11-18T14:40:34","modified_gmt":"2008-11-18T11:40:34","slug":"san-marino-legislative-election-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.electoralgeography.com\/new\/en\/countries\/s\/san-marino\/san-marino-legislative-election-2008.html","title":{"rendered":"San Marino. Legislative Election 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n <\/td>\n\n Reforms and Freedom<\/td>\n\n Pact for San Marino<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n TOTAL<\/td>\n\n 45.78%<\/td>\n\n 54.22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n The City of San Marino<\/td>\n\n 39.63%<\/td>\n\n 60.37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Borgo Maggiore<\/td>\n\n 42.18%<\/td>\n\n 57.82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Serravalle<\/td>\n\n 44.92%<\/td>\n\n 55.08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Acquaviva<\/td>\n\n 51.88%<\/td>\n\n 48.12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Chiesanuova<\/td>\n\n 38.18%<\/td>\n\n 61.82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Domagnano<\/td>\n\n 43.69%<\/td>\n\n 56.31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Faetano<\/td>\n\n 48.44%<\/td>\n\n 51.56%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Fiorentino<\/td>\n\n 50.14%<\/td>\n\n 49.86%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Montegiardino<\/td>\n\n 47.74%<\/td>\n\n 52.26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Estero Citta<\/td>\n\n 56.19%<\/td>\n\n 43.81%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Estero Borgo Maggiore<\/td>\n\n 61.65%<\/td>\n\n 38.35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Estero Serravalle<\/td>\n\n 55.47%<\/td>\n\n 44.53%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n\n\n \t\t\n\t\t\t\t